Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MEZZO TECHNOLOGIES

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of MEZZO TECHNOLOGIES in 10246 MAMMOTH AVE, BATON ROUGE, LA 70804 (NAICS 332410). OSHA activity number 342539210.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Mezzo Technologies — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Mezzo Technologies is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
MEZZO TECHNOLOGIES
Site address
10246 MAMMOTH AVE
City
BATON ROUGE
State
LA
ZIP
70804
Mailing
10246 MAMMOTH AVE, BATON ROUGE, LA 70804
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332410
Employees
47
Ownership type
A

14 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.28 B01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Nov 7, 2017
Abate by
Nov 28, 2017
Penalty
Initial $6,338 · Current $3,169 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.28(b)(1)(i): Each employee on a walking/working surface having an unprotected side or edge which was four feet (1.2m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems.                                                                                                             a.) On or about August 10, 2017, above the etching room; the employer allowed employees to be exposed to falling from heights greater then four feet while accessing a parts area that was located on an air conditioning equipment platform.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3169
  • — Z (S) $6338

1910.110 F02 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 45 exposed
Issued
Nov 7, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,232 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.110(f)(2)(ii): Containers when stored inside shall not be located near exits, stairways, or in areas normally used or intended for the safe exit of people.    a.) On or about August 10, 2017, on the north west side of the Machine Shop near the fire exit; the employer allowed employees to tie an empty forklift propane cylinder to a set of metal racks next to a fire exit. In addition the bottle was stored next to the door of the administrative offices for the machine shop.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $3232

1910.132 D01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Nov 7, 2017
Abate by
Nov 28, 2017
Penalty
Initial $5,070 · Current $2,535 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards were present, or were likely to be present, which necessitated the use of personal protective equipment.    a.) On or about August 10, 2017, in the etching room; the employer allowed employees to work with hazardous materials such as, but not limited to, Specialty 740,835,839 and 982 without conducting a complete hazard assessment or showing that one had been conducted in the past.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2535
  • — Z (S) $5070

1910.132 F01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Nov 7, 2017
Abate by
Nov 28, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,802 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(f)(1): The employer did not provide training to each employee who is required by this section to use personal protective equipment.    a.) On or about August 10, 2016, on the west side of the building in the etching room; the employer allowed employees to use rubber gloves to work with etching chemicals without proper testing, maintenance, or training on the care of the gloves.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $3802

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Nov 7, 2017
Abate by
Nov 28, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,802 · Current $1,901 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use.    a.) On or about August 10, 2016, the employer allowed employees to wear 3M-6003 series half-face respirators while performing grinding, polishing, and removal of dust from micro tubes without having implemented a written respiratory program.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1901
  • — Z (S) $3802

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Nov 7, 2017
Abate by
Nov 28, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,802 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace.    a.) On or about August 10,2017, on the east side of the building; the employer allowed employees to wear 3M-6003 series half-face respirators while performing grinding, polishing, and removal of dust from micro tubes without ensuring that the employees received medical evaluations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $3802

1910.134 F01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Nov 7, 2017
Abate by
Nov 28, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,802 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting face piece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test.     a.) On or about August 10, 2017, on the east side of the building; The employer allowed employees to wear 3M-6003 series half-face respirators while performing grinding, polishing, and removal of dust from micro tubes without ensuring employee respiratory fit testing.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $3802

1910.151 C

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Nov 7, 2017
Abate by
Nov 28, 2017
Penalty
Initial $5,070 · Current $2,535 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use.    a.) On or about August 10, 2017, on the west side of the building outside the etching room; the employer allowed employees to use chemicals that pose an eye hazard without adequate access to a eyewash station.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2535
  • — Z (S) $5070

1910.157 E03

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 45 exposed
Issued
Nov 7, 2017
Abate by
Nov 28, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,802 · Current $1,901 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.157(e)(3): Portable fire extinguishers were not subjected to an annual maintenance check:    a.) On or about August 10, 2017, located throughout the building; the employer had portable fire extinguishers that service tags stated were greater than one year since last serviced.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1901
  • — Z (S) $3802

1910.215 A02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Nov 7, 2017
Abate by
Dec 28, 2017
Penalty
Initial $6,338 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(2): Abrasive wheel(s) used on grinding machinery were not provided with safety guard(s) which covered the spindle end, nut, flange projections.    a.) On or about August 10, 2017 on the west side of the building in a room with grinders and a wet sand table;, the employer allowed employees to use a DeWalt DW758 grinder to grind burs of tools and other pieces of materials without a spindle guard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $6338

1910.215 A04

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Nov 7, 2017
Abate by
Dec 28, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(4): Grinding machinery was not used with work rest(s) to support offhand grinding work and work rest(s) on grinding machinery were not adjusted closely to the wheel with a maximum opening of one-eighth inch:     a.) On or about August 10, 2017, on the west side of the building in a room with grinders and a wet sand table; the employer allowed employees to use a Dewalt DW758 grinder (Serial #2007 07-YL023) to grind burs of tools and other pieces of materials without a work rest.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.215 B09

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 7, 2017
Abate by
Dec 28, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9): Guard for abrasive wheel machine where the operator stands in front of the machine was not constructed so that the peripheral protecting member could be adjusted to the constantly decreasing diameter of the wheel.    a.) On or about August 10 ,2017, on the west side of the building in a room with grinders and a wet sand table;  the employer allowed employees to use a Dewalt DW758 grinder (Serial #2007 07-YL023) to grind burs of tools and other pieces of materials without a tongue guard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.303 G01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Nov 7, 2017
Abate by
Nov 28, 2017
Penalty
Initial $5,070 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(g)(1): Sufficient access and working space was not provided and maintained about all electric equipment (operating at 600 volts, nominal, or less to ground) to permit ready and safe operation and maintenance of such equipment:  a.) On or about August 10, 2017, on the west side of the building inside the testing room; the employer allowed employees to station a cart that was blocking access to electrical disconnect panels.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $5070

1910.38 A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 45 exposed
Issued
Nov 7, 2017
Abate by
Nov 28, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.38(a)(1):  The emergency action plan required by 29 CFR 1910.157(a) or (b) when the employer has elected to partially or totally evacuate the workplace in the event of a fire emergency, did not cover the designated actions that the employer or employees must take to ensure employee safety from the fire and other emergencies:  a.) On or about August 10, 2017, the employer did not establish a written emergency evacuation plan for employees expected to evacuate in the event of a fire or other emergency.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Mezzo Technologies's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342539210.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.