Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: JAMES EVANS

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of JAMES EVANS in 551 NW US HWY 24, TOPEKA, KS 66601 (NAICS 238390). OSHA activity number 342587482.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch James Evans — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for James Evans is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
JAMES EVANS
Site address
551 NW US HWY 24
City
TOPEKA
State
KS
ZIP
66601
Mailing
1486 CLINTON RAYMOND ROAD, CLINTON, MS 39056
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238390
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 31, 2017
Abate by
Oct 19, 2017
Penalty
Initial $1,630 · Current $1,630
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain a safety program which provides for frequent and regular inspections of jobsites, materials, and equipment to be made by a competent person (i.e., a person who is capable of identifying existing and predictable hazards in the surroundings or working conditions which are unsanitary, hazardous, or dangerous to employees, and who has authorization to take prompt corrective measures to eliminate them.   While performing stucco operations the employer did not initiate an adequate safety program that would ensure a safe and healthful working environment. In this case the employees were exposed to a fall hazard of up to fourteen (14) feet from the working surface to the ground below as well as a struck-by hazard due to a lack of head protection for the ground crew.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1630

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 31, 2017
Abate by
Sep 27, 2017
Penalty
Initial $1,630 · Current $1,630
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there is a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, shall be protected by protective helmets.  The employer did not ensure that ground crew employees who were providing support for stucco operations wore head protection. Employees were exposed to the hazard of being struck-by falling materials and/or equipment.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1630

1926.451 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 31, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,309 · Current $2,309
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii)  The employer did not ensure that the working surface was completely planked on the second level of the scaffold located at the rear of the building. Two aluminum planks were installed where three were required to fully plank the working surface. Employees were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately fourteen (14) feet to the ground below.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2309

1926.451 G01 VII

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 31, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): For all scaffolds not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, each employee was not protected by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section.  The employer did not ensure that railings were installed on the entire second level of the scaffold located at the rear of the building. Employees were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately fourteen (14) feet to the ground below.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

View James Evans's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342587482.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.