Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: THE BREWER COMPANY

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of THE BREWER COMPANY in 30060 LAKELAND BLVD., WICKLIFFE, OH 44092 (NAICS 324122). OSHA activity number 342588084.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch The Brewer Company — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for The Brewer Company is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
THE BREWER COMPANY
Site address
30060 LAKELAND BLVD.
City
WICKLIFFE
State
OH
ZIP
44092
Mailing
30060 LAKELAND BLVD., WICKLIFFE, OH 44092
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
324122
Employees
14
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 24, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,217 · Current $1,330 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:    On or about August 25, 2017, employees were required to wear tight-fitting half-face respirators while making batches and have not received a medical evaluation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1330
  • — Z (S) $2217

1910.134 F01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 24, 2018
Abate by
Feb 28, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):  On or about August 25, 2017, employees were required to wear tight-fitting half-face respirators while making batches and have not received a fit test.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jan 24, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,217 · Current $1,330 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1): The employer did not provide effective training to ensure that each employee could demonstrate knowledge of 1910.134(k)(1)(i) - (vii):    On or about August 25, 2017, employees were required to wear tight-fitting half-face respirators while making batches. Employees have not received respiratory protection training in accordance with the standard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1330
  • — Z (S) $2217

1910.134 K06

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 24, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(6): The employer did not provide the basic advisory information on respirators, as presented in Appendix D of 29 CFR 1910.134, in written or oral format to employees who wear respirators when such use was not required by the employer:  On or about August 25, 2017, the employer did not provide employees with Appendix D of the respirator standard when voluntarily using N-95 filtering face piece respirators.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.157 G02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 14 exposed
Issued
Jan 24, 2018
Abate by
Feb 28, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,217 · Current $1,330 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.157(g)(2): The educational program to familiarize employees with the general principles of fire extinguisher use and the hazards involved with incipient stage fire fighting was not provided to all employees upon initial employment, and at least annually thereafter:    On or about August 25, 2017, the employer did not provide initial and/or annual training on the emergency action plan in case of fire. The employer expects employees to evacuate the building, however employees are not trained on fire extinguishers and/or building evacuation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1330
  • — Z (S) $2217

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 14 exposed
Issued
Jan 24, 2018
Penalty
Initial $9,239 · Current $5,544 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:    On or about August 25, 2018, the employer did not provide hazard communication training for employees. Employees work with chemicals including, but not limited to, asphalt, ASTM D-450 Type 1, Black Knight Cold, Mergal K10N, and white coating.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $5544
  • — Z (S) $9239

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 14 exposed
Issued
Jan 24, 2018
Abate by
Feb 28, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated, the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed, the date(s) of the hazard assessment, and, which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment:  On or about August 25, 2017, the workplace hazard assessment had not been put in writing and certified with the person conducting the evaluation and the dates the hazard assessment was completed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.157 E02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 14 exposed
Issued
Jan 24, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.157(e)(2): Portable fire extinguishers were not visually inspected at least monthly:  On or about August 25, 2017, the employer did not visually inspect fire extinguishers at least monthly.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 F06 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 14 exposed
Issued
Jan 24, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(6)(i): Except as provided in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(7) and 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(8), the employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the information required by 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(1)(i) through 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(1)(v):  On or about August 25, 2017, the employer did not ensure that storage containers containing white coatings were labeled with the identity of the chemicals. White coatings include, but are not limited to, Permacool Coating White, Fortress White Elastomeric, and Fortress White Acrylic Cement.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View The Brewer Company's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342588084.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.