Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: PATROCINIO GARCIA HERNANDEZ

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of PATROCINIO GARCIA HERNANDEZ in 2130 KENSLEY DRIVE, MILTON, GA 30004 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 342599743.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Patrocinio Garcia Hernandez for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Patrocinio Garcia Hernandez is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
2130 KENSLEY DRIVE
City
MILTON
State
GA
ZIP
30004
Mailing
1735 DARWIN ROAD, SMYRNA, GA 30080
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
4
Ownership type
Private (A)

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 22, 2017
Abate by
Oct 4, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,173 · Current $2,173
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): 1926.102(a)(1): Employees were not provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents:  (a) New residential construction on Lot #9, Second level top plate: On or about 08/29/2017, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to struck-by hazards while operating pneumatic framing nail guns, in that eye protection was not provided or used as employees operated pneumatic tools at 120 PSI engaged in framing activities.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2173

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 22, 2017
Abate by
Oct 4, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,803 · Current $3,803
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m)  or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b), nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502:   (a) New residential construction located on Lot #9, Second floor top plates: On or about 08/29/2017, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to fall hazards of approximately 21-feet, 2-inches to the lower level, in that fall protection system was not provided to employees engaged in the installation of ceiling trusses.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $3803

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 22, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,173 · Current $2,173
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:  (a) New residential construction located on Lot #9, Rear side: On or about 08/29/2017, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to fall hazards of approximately 11-feet, 4-inches to the lower level, in that the ladder used to access the upper landing surface was not extended at least 3-feet or secured to the structure to allow for access to the upper levels.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2173

1926.1053 B06

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Sep 22, 2017
Abate by
Oct 4, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(6): Ladders were used on surfaces which were not stable and level:  (a) New residential construction located on Lot #9, Rear side: On or about 08/29/2017, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to fall hazards of up to 11-feet, 4-inches while using a ladder on a pile of lumber, in that the feet of the ladder was not set on a stable/level surface.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

View Patrocinio Garcia Hernandez's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 342599743.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.