Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: PRIDE ROOFING LLC

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of PRIDE ROOFING LLC in 9 PORTSMOUTH AVENUE, STRATHAM, NH 03885 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 342604246.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Pride Roofing LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Pride Roofing LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
PRIDE ROOFING LLC
Site address
9 PORTSMOUTH AVENUE
City
STRATHAM
State
NH
ZIP
03885
Mailing
9 WALNUT HILL DR., RAYMOND, NH 03077
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

11 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 C02 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 19, 2018
Abate by
Jan 25, 2018
Penalty
Initial $4,268 · Current $4,268
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2)(i): Footings were not level, sound, rigid, and capable of supporting the loaded scaffold without settling or displacement:  Site- Employees were not protected from a fall and scaffold collapse hazard where a ladder supporting a ladder jack scaffold was not able to support the intended load without settling. On or about August 29, 2017 a Louisville AE2824 extension ladder was used to support part of a ladder jack scaffold. The bottom of the ladder settled when loaded causing the bottom of the ladder to sink into the ground and the top of the ladder to fall off of its building support. Two employees fell off of the ladder jack scaffold as a result of the unintended scaffold movement.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4268
  • — Z (S) $4268

1926.1053 B04

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 19, 2018
Abate by
Jan 25, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4): Ladder(s) were used for purposes other than the purpose for which they were designed:  Site- Employees were not protected from a fall and scaffold collapse hazard where a ladder supporting a ladder jack scaffold was used without its feet. On or about August 29, 2017 a Louisville AE2824 extension ladder was used without feet to support part of a ladder jack scaffold. The bottom of the ladder sunk into the ground when loaded due to the missing feet causing the top of the ladder to fall off of its building support. Two employees fell off of the ladder jack scaffold as a result of the unintended ladder movement.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 F01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 19, 2018
Abate by
Jan 25, 2018
Penalty
Initial $4,268 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(1): Scaffold and/or scaffold components were loaded in excess of their maximum intended loads or rated capacities, whichever was less:    Site- Employees were not protected from a fall and scaffold collapse hazard where extension ladders, ladder jacks, scaffold platforms were loaded beyond their maximum intended loads.  On or about August 29, 2017 a ladder jack scaffold which had scaffold components that were overloaded moved unintentionally due to the scaffold capacity causing two employees to fall off of the scaffold.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $4268

1926.451 F03

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 19, 2018
Abate by
Jan 25, 2018
Penalty
Initial $4,268 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(3): Scaffolds and scaffold components were not inspected for visible defects by a competent person before each work shift, and after any occurrence which could affect a scaffold's structural integrity:    Site- Employees were not protected from a fall and scaffold collapse hazard where a ladder jack scaffold was not inspected by a competent person prior to employees working from the scaffold.  On or about August 29, 2017 a ladder jack scaffold which had defective scaffold components moved unintentionally causing two employees to fall off of the scaffold.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $4268

1926.451 F07

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 19, 2018
Abate by
Jan 25, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7): Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered, by trained and experienced employees under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration:; Such activities were not performed only by experienced and trained employees selected for such work by the competent person.    Site- Employees were not protected from a fall and scaffold collapse hazard where a ladder jack scaffold was not erected under the supervision of a competent person prior to employees working from the scaffold.  On or about August 29, 2017 a ladder jack scaffold which had defective scaffold components moved unintentionally causing two employees to fall off of the scaffold.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B15

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 19, 2018
Abate by
Jan 25, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(15): Ladders were not inspected by a competent person for visible defects on a periodic basis and after an occurrence that could affect their safe use:    Site- Employees were not protected from a fall and scaffold collapse hazard where a ladder supporting a ladder jack scaffold was not inspected by a competent person before being used without its feet. On or about August 29, 2017 a Louisville AE2824 extension ladder was used without feet to support part of a ladder jack scaffold. The bottom of the ladder sunk into the ground when loaded due to the missing feet causing top of the ladder to fall off of its building support. Two employees fell off of the ladder jack scaffold as a result of the unintended ladder movement.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.452 K04

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 19, 2018
Abate by
Jan 25, 2018
Penalty
Initial $4,268 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.452(k)(4): Ladders used to support ladder jacks were not placed, fastened, or equipped with devices to prevent slipping:    Site- Employees were not protected from a fall and scaffold collapse hazard where ladders supporting a ladder jack scaffold were not erected in a manner to prevent the ladders from slipping. On or about August 29, 2017 a Louisville AE2824 extension ladder supporting part of a ladder jack scaffold moved unintentionally causing the top of the ladder to fall off of its building support. Two employees fell off of the ladder jack scaffold as a result of the unintended ladder movement.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $4268

1926.452 K05

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 19, 2018
Abate by
Jan 25, 2018
Penalty
Initial $4,268 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.452(k)(5): Ladder jack scaffold platforms were bridged one to another.    Site- Employees were not protected from a fall and scaffold collapse hazard where ladder jack scaffold platforms were bridged one to another over a common ladder. On or about August 29, 2017 a ladder jack scaffold which had scaffold platforms bridged over a single ladder and ladder jack was overloaded and moved unintentionally moved causing two employees to fall off of the scaffold.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $4268

1926.454 A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jan 19, 2018
Abate by
Jan 25, 2018
Penalty
Initial $4,268 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards.    Site- Employees working from a ladder jack scaffold were not provided with scaffold training by a qualified person to recognize hazards associated with scaffolds. On or about August 29, 2017 a ladder jack scaffold which had defective scaffold components moved unintentionally causing two employees to fall off of the scaffold.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $4268

1926.1053 B22

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 19, 2018
Abate by
Jan 25, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,049 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(22): Employees  using ladders were carrying objects or loads that could cause the employee to lose balance and fall:    Site- Employees were not protected from a fall hazard where bundles of shingles and boxes of ice and water shield were carried up ladders to stock the roof with building materials.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $3049

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jan 19, 2018
Abate by
Feb 7, 2018
Penalty
Initial $8,536 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:    Site- Employees exposed to fall hazards while working from a roof and ladder jack scaffold where not provided with fall protection training from the employer. On or about August 29, 2017 an employee who had not received any fall protection training from the employer did not attach themselves to a life line when accessing a ladder jack scaffold and fell from the scaffold.    Pride Roofing LLC was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard, 1910.132(f)(1), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1041939, citation number 1, item number 1d and was affirmed as a final order on April 20, 2015, with respect to a workplace located at 65 Portsmouth Ave, Stratham, NH 03885.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (R) $8536

View Pride Roofing LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342604246.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.