Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: UFP TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of UFP TECHNOLOGIES, INC. in 172 EAST MAIN STREET, GEORGETOWN, MA 01833 (NAICS 326150). OSHA activity number 342608502.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch UFP Technologies, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for UFP Technologies, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
172 EAST MAIN STREET
City
GEORGETOWN
State
MA
ZIP
01833
Mailing
100 HALE STREET, NEWBURYPORT, MA 01950
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
326150
Employees
800
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.332 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 6, 2017
Abate by
Nov 13, 2017
Penalty
Initial $12,675 · Current $7,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.332(b)(1): Employees were not trained in and familiar with the safety-related work practices required by 1910.331 through 1910.335 that pertained to their respective job assignments:    (a) Location 172 East Main Street, Georgetown, MA:  On or about 09/01/2017, an employee was not trained or familiar in safety-related work practices required by 1910.331 through 1910.335 that pertained to their respective job assignments.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $7000
  • — C (S) $12675
  • — Z (S) $12675

1910.333 A02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 6, 2017
Abate by
Nov 13, 2017
Penalty
Initial $12,675 · Current $7,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.333(a)(2): Where exposed live parts were not de-energized (i.e., for reasons of increased or additional hazards or infeasibility), other safety-related work practices were not used to protect employees who could be exposed to the electrical hazards involved:    (a) Location 172 East Main Street, Georgetown, MA:  On or about 09/01/2017, the employer did not ensure that safety related work practices were used to protect employees who work on and near energized parts and were exposed to the electrical hazards involved.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $7000
  • — C (S) $12675
  • — Z (S) $12675

1910.335 A01 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 6, 2017
Abate by
Nov 13, 2017
Penalty
Initial $12,675 · Current $7,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.335(a)(1)(i): Employees working in areas where there were potential electrical hazards were not provided with electrical protective equipment that was appropriate for the specific parts of the body that needed to be protected and for the work being performed:    (a) Location 172 East Main Street, Georgetown, MA:  On or about 09/01/2017, the employer did not ensure that employees were provided and use electrical protective equipment that is appropriate for the specific parts of the body that need to be protected and for the work being performed.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $7000
  • — C (S) $12675
  • — Z (S) $12675

1910.335 A01 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 6, 2017
Abate by
Nov 13, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.335(a)(1)(ii): Protective equipment was not maintained in a safe, reliable condition and/or was not periodically inspected or tested:      (a) Location 172 East Main Street, Georgetown, MA:  On or about 09/01/2017, the employer did not ensure that electrical protective equipment (rubber insulating gloves) were periodically tested as required by CFR 1910.137(a)(2)(i).    (b) Location 172 East Main Street, Georgetown, MA:  On or about 09/01/2017, the employer did not ensure that tools utilized for work on or near energized electrical equipment were safe for the use.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View UFP Technologies, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342608502.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.