Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: EDWARDS EQUIPMENT SALES, INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of EDWARDS EQUIPMENT SALES, INC. in 321 CITATION COURT WEST, BIRMINGHAM, AL 35211 (NAICS 332999). OSHA activity number 342616463.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Edwards Equipment Sales, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Edwards Equipment Sales, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
321 CITATION COURT WEST
City
BIRMINGHAM
State
AL
ZIP
35211
Mailing
321 CITATION COURT WEST, BIRMINGHAM, AL 35211
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332999
Employees
33
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.252 B02 III

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 13, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,232 · Current $1,939 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.252(b)(2)(iii): Workers or other persons adjacent to the welding areas were not protected from the rays by noncombustible or flameproof screens or shields or required to wear appropriate goggles.  (a) On or about September 6, 2017 - Adjacent to welding area, employees, hanging components onto conveyor, were permitted to work near and around welding operations without being protected from arc welding rays.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1939.2
  • — Z (S) $3232

1910.134 C02 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 13, 2017
Abate by
Oct 23, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(i): The employer did not provide respirator users with information contained in Appendix D to this section when the employer determined that any voluntary respirator use was permissible:  (a) On or about September 6, 2017 - Fabrication, Appendix D was not provided for employees voluntarily permitted to use NIOSH N95 particulate respirators while engaged in welding activities.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 13, 2017
Abate by
Oct 25, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  a) On or about September 6, 2017 - Facility, medical evaluations were not provided to employees required by the employer to wear 3M half-face respirators when engaged in powder coating.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 F01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 13, 2017
Abate by
Oct 25, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):  a) On or about September 6, 2017 - Facility, fit tests were not provided to employees required by the employer to wear 3M half-face respirators when engaged in powder coating.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1026 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Oct 13, 2017
Abate by
Dec 1, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 0689

29 CFR 1910.1026(d)(1): The employer with a workplace or work operation covered by this standard did not determine the 8-hour time-weighted average exposure for each employee exposed to chromium (VI):  (a) On or about September 6, 2017 - Fabrication, initial monitoring had not been conducted for employees engaged in welding of metal components. Full shift sampling was performed during one shift on September 13, 2017. The sampling results were below the OSHA Permissible Exposure Limits.   The employer may use these sampling results to meet the initial monitoring requirement for Hexavalent Chromium or perform additional monitoring.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1026 I04 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 25 exposed
Issued
Oct 13, 2017
Abate by
Nov 8, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 0689

29 CFR 1910.1026(i)(4)(i): Employees were allowed to consume food or beverages at a worksite where chromium (VI) was present; however, the employer did not ensure that the eating and drinking areas were maintained as free as practicable of chromium (VI):  a) On or about September 6, 2017 - Breakroom, the presence of chromium(VI) was detected on a breakroom table.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Edwards Equipment Sales, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342616463.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.