Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: M. POTTEIGER, INC

Unprogrammed Other inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Other safety inspection of M. POTTEIGER, INC in ANTRIM COMMONS DRIVE ANTRIM COMMONS BUSINESS PARK, GREENCASTLE, PA 17225 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 342629656.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch M. Potteiger, INC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for M. Potteiger, INC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
M. POTTEIGER, INC
Site address
ANTRIM COMMONS DRIVE ANTRIM COMMONS BUSINESS PARK
City
GREENCASTLE
State
PA
ZIP
17225
Mailing
3545 N SUSQUEHANNA TRAIL, YORK, PA 17406
Inspection type
Unprogrammed Other (I)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
9
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.502 H01 IV

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 20, 2017
Penalty
Initial $8,873 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.502(h)(1)(iv): The safety monitor was not close enough to communicate orally with the employee:  a) Roof - A safety monitor was approximately 200 - 250 feet from the employees working at the edge of the roof and was not within a distance close enough to communicate with the employees, on or about September 8, 2017.  No abatement certification or documentation required.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $8873
  • — Z (S) $8873

1926.502 H01 V

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 20, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $4,081
29 CFR 1926.502(h)(1)(v): The safety monitor had other responsibilities which could take the monitor's attention from the monitoring function:    a) Roof - A safety monitor was engaged in roofing activities and was not monitoring employees that were working on the roof of the building, on or about September 8, 2017.    No abatement certification or documentation required.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $4081
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.502 H02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 20, 2017
Penalty
Initial $8,873 · Current $4,081 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.502(h)(2): Mechanical equipment was used in an area where a safety monitoring system was used in roofing operations:    a) Roof - Employees operated a mechanical roof buggy and four wheel cart next to the edge of the roof where a safety monitoring system was being used by employees conducting roofing work, on or about September 8, 2017.    No abatement certification or documentation required.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $4081
  • — C (S) $8873
  • — Z (S) $8873

1926.503 B01

Deleted Other-than-serious 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Oct 20, 2017
Abate by
Nov 16, 2017
Penalty
Initial $711 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1): The employer did not verify compliance with paragraph (a) of this section (fall protection training) by preparing a written certification record which contained the name or other identity of the employee trained, the date(s) of the training, and the signature of the person who conducted the training or the signature of the employer:  a) Roof - The employer did not prepare a written certification verifying that employees had been trained in hazards related to falls from elevation, on or about September 8, 2017.   Abatement certification and documentation required within 10 days after abatement date.  The certification shall include a statement that abatement is complete, the date and method of abatement, and state that employees and their representatives were informed of this abatement.  Abatement documentation shall include documents demonstrating that abatement is complete, such as evidence of the purchase or repair of equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement or other written records.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $0
  • — C (O) $711
  • — Z (O) $711

View M. Potteiger, INC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342629656.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.