Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MARGO STATE LINE, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of MARGO STATE LINE, INC. in 134 NELSON STREET, FOLKSTON, GA 31537 (NAICS 444220). OSHA activity number 342634417.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Margo State Line, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Margo State Line, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
134 NELSON STREET
City
FOLKSTON
State
GA
ZIP
31537
Mailing
P.O. BOX 68, FOLKSTON, GA 31537
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
444220
Employees
35
Ownership type
A

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.23 B01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 1, 2018
Abate by
Mar 27, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,298 · Current $1,649 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.23(b)(1): Ladder rungs, steps, and cleats were not uniformly spaced when the ladder was in position for use:     A) North side of production building, on or about September 26, 2017, the ladder rungs on the ladder to the exterior rock hopper platform were not evenly spaced, exposing employees to a four foot fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1649
  • — Z (S) $3298

1910.28 B01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 1, 2018
Abate by
Mar 27, 2018
Penalty
Initial $5,497 · Current $2,749 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.28(b)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each employee on a walking-working surface with an unprotected side or edge that was 4 feet (1.2 m) or more above a lower level was protected from falling by one or more of the following:  Guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems:    A) Production building, on or about September 6, 2017, employees walked on a conveyor belt that had an open side to access a palletizer, exposing the employees to an 11 foot fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2748.5
  • — Z (S) $5497

1910.28 B07

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 1, 2018
Abate by
Mar 27, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.28(b)(7): The employer did not ensure that each employee on a walking-working surface near an opening, including one with a chute attached, where the inside bottom edge of the opening is less than 39 inches (99 cm) above that walking-working surface and the outside bottom edge of the opening is 4 feet (1.2 m) or more above a lower level was protected from falling:  A) North side of production bagging building, on or about September 7, 2017, the access area on the platform to the ladder was not equipped with fall protection, exposing employees to an approximately seven foot fall hazard.     B) East side of robotic bag stacker, on or about September 27, 2017, the access area on the platform to the ladder was not equipped with fall protection, exposing employees to a six foot fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.110 F07

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 1, 2018
Penalty
Initial $4,398 · Current $2,199 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.110(f)(7): LP gas container storage location(s) were not provided with at least one approved portable fire extinguisher having a minimum rating of 8-B, C:     A) South side of maintenance building, on or about September 6, 2017, an above ground LP tank used to refill portable LP cylinders did not have a fire extinguisher in the area.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2199
  • — Z (S) $4398

1910.147 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 1, 2018
Abate by
Mar 27, 2018
Penalty
Initial $5,497 · Current $2,749 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative:     A) Workplace, on or about September 6, 2018, the employer did not establish a hazardous energy control program for equipment such as a robotic arm stacker and Hamer Fischbein bagging machines, exposing employees to a hazard of moving parts.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2748.5
  • — Z (S) $5497

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 1, 2018
Abate by
May 21, 2018
Penalty
Initial $4,398 · Current $2,199 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:     A) Production building palletizer, on or about September 6, 2017, the in-running nip point by the conveyor drum located by a walking working platform was not guarded, exposing employees to an in running nip point hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2199
  • — Z (S) $4398

1910.303 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 1, 2018
Abate by
Mar 27, 2018
Penalty
Initial $5,497 · Current $2,749 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(2): Listed or labeled electrical equipment was not used or installed in accordance with instructions included in the listing or labeling:    A) Production Area, on or about September 7, 2017, employees operated a Hamer 2090 bagging machine by opening the cover to the control panel, exposing the employees electrical shock/burns from 240 volt energized electrical parts.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2748.5
  • — Z (S) $5497

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 1, 2018
Abate by
Mar 27, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:   A)  Facility, on or about September 6, 2017, the employer did not develop or implement a hazard communication program for employees who were exposed to hazardous materials such as, but not limited to propane, oxygen and acetylene, exposing employees to skin irritation and minor chemical burns.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 G08

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 1, 2018
Abate by
Mar 27, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8):   The employer did not maintain in the workplace copies of the required safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical:   A) Facility, on or about September 6, 2017, the employer did not maintain Safety Data Sheets (SDS) for the hazardous materials such as propane, oxygen and acetylene that are used, exposing employees to skin irritation and minor chemical burns.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 H01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 1, 2018
Abate by
Mar 27, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:   A) Facility, on or about September 6, 2017, the employer did not train the employees on the hazards associated with the materials that they work with, such as propane and oxygen and acetylene, exposing employees to skin irritation and chemical burns.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Margo State Line, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342634417.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.