Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: CADENCE INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of CADENCE INC. in 1425 S. NEENAH AVE, STURGEON BAY, WI 54235 (NAICS 332116). OSHA activity number 342636115.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Cadence INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Cadence INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
CADENCE INC.
Site address
1425 S. NEENAH AVE
City
STURGEON BAY
State
WI
ZIP
54235
Mailing
1425 S. NEENAH AVE, STURGEON BAY, WI 54235
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332116
Employees
48
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 D

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 26, 2018
Abate by
Feb 26, 2018
Penalty
Initial $7,853 · Current $7,853
29 CFR 1910.147(d): The established procedure for the application of energy control (the lockout or tagout procedure) was not done in sequence as required by 29 CFR 1910.147(d)(1) through (d)(6):  a.  On or about September 12, 2017 the employer had set-up operators that did not control hazardous energies during die changing activities on the mechanical power presses.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $7853

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 5 instances 25 exposed
Issued
Jan 26, 2018
Abate by
Mar 7, 2018
Penalty
Initial $7,853 · Current $7,853
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:  a. On or about September 12, 2017 the employer had an Insert Molding Machine that had the safety interlocks defeated which exposed the operator to struck-by hazards by the mechanical arm when they went past the barrier guarding.  b. On or about September 12, 2017 the employer had a 60 Ton Brudder press that did not have adequate guarding on the sides of the press.  The sides of the press had openings for the feeding and discharge of roll stock that were large enough that an employee could reach the pinch point of the dies.  c. On or about September 12, 2017 the employer had a Dobby NXT-40 Mechanical Power Press (#994) that did not have adequate guarding on the discharge side of the press.  The discharge side of the press had an opening large enough that an employee could reach the pinch point of the dies.  d. On or about September 12, 2017 the employer had a Dobby NXT -40 Mechanical Power Press (#995) that did not have adequate guarding on the discharge side of the press.  The discharge side of the press had an opening large enough that an employee could reach the pinch point of the dies.  e. On or about September 12, 2017 the employer had a Mechanical Power Press (#961) that did not have adequate guarding.  The barrier guarding over the point of operation had an approximately 10 inch opening that allowed access to the pinch point of the dies.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $7853

1910.178 A04

Other-than-serious 2 instances 11 exposed
Issued
Jan 26, 2018
Abate by
Feb 26, 2018
Penalty
Initial $881 · Current $881
29 CFR 1910.178(a)(4): Modifications or additions which affect capacity and safe operation of powered industrial truck were performed by the employer without the manufacturer's prior written approval:  a.  The employer had two forklift boom attachments that were used to hoist and load dies into their machinery without approval from the forklift manufacturer that it was safe to do so.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $881

View Cadence INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342636115.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.