Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ARCHER DANIELS MIDLAND COMPANY

Federal Agency inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a federal Agency safety inspection of ARCHER DANIELS MIDLAND COMPANY in 1892 US HWY 83, SUBLETTE, KS 67877 (NAICS 493130). OSHA activity number 342640844.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Archer Daniels Midland Company — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Archer Daniels Midland Company is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1892 US HWY 83
City
SUBLETTE
State
KS
ZIP
67877
Mailing
1892 US HWY 83, SUBLETTE, KS 67877
Inspection type
Federal Agency (M)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
493130
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.28 B03 I A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jan 11, 2018
Abate by
Feb 7, 2018
Penalty
Initial $10,163 · Current $6,377 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.28(b)(3)(i)(A): The employer did not ensure that each employee on a walking-working surface was protected from falling into any hole or pit that was 4 feet (1.2 m) or more above a lower level by a cover or covers:     The employer is failing to protect employees from tripping and fall hazards associated with grain elevator housekeeping activities. This was most recently documented, on 09/19/17, at the establishment located at 1892 US Hwy 83, Sublette, Kansas. The employer did not assure covers were readily available for all floor holes on the distribution level of the grain elevator.  Employees engaged in housekeeping activities were exposed to trip and fall hazards into open distribution level floor holes.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $6377
  • — C (S) $10163
  • — Z (S) $10163

1910.272 E02

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jan 11, 2018
Abate by
Feb 7, 2018
Penalty
Initial $12,934 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.272(e)(2): Employees assigned special tasks in the grain handling facility, such as bin entry and handling of flammable or toxic substances, were not provided training to perform these tasks safety:  The employer is failing to protect employees from entrapment and engulfment hazards associated with the cleaning of grain elevator grain bins. This was most recently documented, on 09/14/17, at the establishment located at 1892 US Hwy 83, Sublette, Kansas. The employer did not ensure the employees were adequately trained on grain bin entry procedures for the type of bin being entered and the conditions created while walking on moving grain while vacuuming grain out of the bin.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $12934
  • — Z (S) $12934

1910.272 G01 IV

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 11, 2018
Abate by
Feb 7, 2018
Penalty
Initial $12,934 · Current $12,934
29 CFR 1910.272(g)(1)(iv): The employer did not prohibit "walking down grain" and similar practices where the employee walks on grain to make it flow within or out from a grain storage structure, or where an employee is on moving grain:    The employer is failing to protect employees from entrapment and engulfment hazards associated with the cleaning of grain elevator grain bins. This was most recently documented, on 09/14/17, at the establishment located at 1892 US Hwy 83, Sublette, Kansas. The employer did not ensure employees from walking on moving grain while vacuuming grain from the bottom of a grain bin resulting in an employee being engulfed in grain.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $12934
  • — C (S) $12934
  • — Z (S) $12934

1910.272 G02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 11, 2018
Abate by
Feb 7, 2018
Penalty
Initial $12,934 · Current $12,934
29 CFR 1910.272(g)(2): When entering the grain handling facility bins, silos, or tanks from a level at or above the level of the stored grain, employees did not wear a body harness with lifeline, or use a boatswain's chair that met the requirements of Subpart D, of this part:     The employer is failing to protect employees from entrapment and engulfment hazards associated with grain bin cleaning activities. This was most recently documented, on 09/14/17, at the establishment located at 1892 US Hwy 83, Sublette, Kansas. The employer did not ensure employees entering a grain bin to vacuum out grain in the bottom of a grain bin utilized a lifeline when walking or standing on grain.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $12934
  • — C (S) $12934
  • — Z (S) $12934

1910.272 G04

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 11, 2018
Abate by
Feb 7, 2018
Penalty
Initial $12,934 · Current $12,934
29 CFR 1910.272(g)(4): The employer did not provide equipment for rescue operations, which was specifically suited for the bin, silo, or tank being entered:    The employer is failing to provide a means of rescue for employees entering grain bins associated with grain bin cleaning activities. This was most recently documented, on 09/14/17, at the establishment located at 1892 US Hwy 83, Sublette, Kansas. The employer did not provide and ensure rescue equipment such as but not limited to hoisting and winching equipment was readily available prior to employees being permitted to enter into a grain to remove grain from the bottom of the bin.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $12934
  • — C (S) $12934
  • — Z (S) $12934

1910.303 F01

Other-than-serious 3 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Jan 11, 2018
Penalty
Initial $10,163 · Current $6,377 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(f)(1): Each disconnecting means required by Subpart S of Part 1910 for motors and appliances was not legibly marked to indicate its purpose, nor located and arranged so the purpose was evident:    The employer is failing to protect employees from electrical hazards associated with the operation of electrical equipment. This was most recently documented, on 09/18/17, at the establishment located at 1892 US Hwy 83, Sublette, Kansas. The employer did not ensure electrical disconnects were properly labeled to indicate their intended use for the equipment listed below.    a) Exterior disconnect for aeration motor for bin #26.    b) Exterior disconnect for aeration motor fan on bin #10.    c) Disconnect for man lift in the MCC room.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $6377
  • — C (S) $10163
  • — Z (S) $10163

1910.303 G01 II

Deleted Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jan 11, 2018
Penalty
Initial $6,097 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(g)(1)(ii): The required working space about electric equipment rated 600 volts, nominal, or less to ground, was used for storage.  The employer is failing to protect employees from electrical and fire hazards. This was most recently documented, on 09/18/17, at the establishment located at 1892 US Hwy 83, Sublette, Kansas. The employer did not ensure the area immediately in front of an electrical circuit breaker panel box was clear of equipment and materials impeding access to the box in the event of an emergency, exposing employees to electrical and fire hazards.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $6097
  • — Z (S) $6097

1910.305 B02 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jan 11, 2018
Penalty
Initial $10,163 · Current $6,378 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(2)(i): All pull boxes, junction boxes, and fittings were not provided with covers approved for the purpose; and each outlet box in completed installations did not have a cover, faceplate, or fixture canopy:     The employer is failing to protect employees from electrical shock hazards. This was most recently documented on 09/18/17, at the establishment located 1892 US Hwy 83, Sublette, Kansas. In the main work room the employer did not provide a cover for the railcar counter exposing employees to energized electrical wires.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (O) $6378
  • — C (S) $10163
  • — Z (S) $10163

View Archer Daniels Midland Company's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342640844.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.