HARTLAND, WI —
OSHA Inspection: BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE WISCONSIN METRO-MILWAUKEE, LLC
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE WISCONSIN METRO-MILWAUKEE, LLC in 500 W. NORTH SHORE DR., HARTLAND, WI 53029 (NAICS 424820). OSHA activity number 342692621.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- BREAKTHRU BEVERAGE WISCONSIN METRO-MILWAUKEE, LLC
- Site address
- 500 W. NORTH SHORE DR.
- City
- HARTLAND
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 53029
- Mailing
- 500 W. NORTH SHORE DR., HARTLAND, WI 53029
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 424820
- Employees
- 50
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
11 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.22 A03
- Issued
- Feb 27, 2018
- Abate by
- Mar 23, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $7,391 · Current $2,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.22(a)(3): Walking-working surfaces were not maintained free of hazards such as sharp or protruding objects, loose boards, corrosion, leaks, spills, snow, and ice: (a) On or about 9/28/2017 the employer did not ensure that hydraulic fluid was cleaned up from the warehouse floor.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $2500
- — Z (S) $7391
1910.28 B01 I C
- Issued
- Feb 27, 2018
- Abate by
- Mar 23, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $12,934 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.28(b)(1)(i)(C): (b) Protection from fall hazards (1) Unprotected Sides and edges. (I) Except at provided elsewhere in this section, the employer did not ensure that each employee on a walking-working surface with an unprotected side or edge that was 4 feet or more above a lower was protected from falling by a (C)personal fall protection system such as personal fall arrest, travel restraint or positioning system. (a) The employer did not ensure that employees operating powered industrial vehicles (order pickers), to pick product, were protected from fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $12934
1910.30 A01
- Issued
- Feb 27, 2018
- Abate by
- Apr 13, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $4,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.30(a)(1): The employer did not provide training to each employee who uses personal fall protection systems prior to being exposed to a fall hazard. (a) The employer did not ensure that employees exposed to potential fall hazards had been trained to recognize and minimize the fall hazards associated with their work.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $4000
- — Z (S) $0
1910.132 D02
- Issued
- Feb 27, 2018
- Abate by
- Apr 13, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $5,543 · Current $2,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed through a written certification that identified the workplace evaluated; the person which certified that the evaluation had been performed; the date(s) of the hazard assessment; and, which identified the document as a certification of hazard assessment. (a) The employer did not conduct a hazard assessment to determine the proper personal protective equipment for specific work activities such as but not limited to: adding water to the forklift batteries and powered industrial vehicle operation.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2500
- — Z (S) $5543
1910.133 A01
- Issued
- Feb 27, 2018
- Abate by
- Apr 13, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation. (a) The employer did not ensure that employees who add water to forklift batteries used appropriate eye or face protection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.138 A
- Issued
- Feb 27, 2018
- Abate by
- Apr 13, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.138(a): The employer did not select and require employee(s) to use appropriate hand protection when employees' hands were exposed to hazards such as those from skin absorption of harmful substances, severe cuts or lacerations, severe abrasions, punctures, chemical burns, thermal burns, and harmful temperature extremes. (a) The employer did not select and require employees to use appropriate hand protection when adding water to forklift batteries. This exposed employees to chemical burns when filling forklift batteries.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.176 B
- Issued
- Feb 27, 2018
- Abate by
- Apr 13, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $7,391 · Current $2,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.176(b): Material stored in tiers was not stacked, blocked, interlocked or limited in height so that it was stable and secure against sliding and collapse. (a) Empty kegs of beer that were stacked four levels high were not stable and secure.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2500
- — Z (S) $7391
1910.178 L02 II
- Issued
- Feb 27, 2018
- Abate by
- Apr 13, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $9,239 · Current $5,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(2)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training consisting of a combination of formal instruction (e.g., lecture, discussion, interactive computer learning, video tape, written material), practical training (demonstrations performed by the trainer and practical exercises performed by the trainee), and evaluation of the operator's performance in the workplace. (a) The employer did not ensure that each employee received a combination of formal instruction, practical training, and an evaluation of the operator's performance prior to allowing employees to operate powered industrial vehicles.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $5000
- — Z (S) $9239
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Feb 27, 2018
- Abate by
- Apr 13, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $7,391 · Current $4,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in paragraphs (f), (g), and (h) will be met: (a) The employer did not develop and implement a written hazard communication program (including the global harmonized system). Employees use chemicals such as but not limited to, forklift battery acid.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4000
- — Z (S) $7391
1910.1200 G01
- Issued
- Feb 27, 2018
- Abate by
- Apr 13, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): The employer did not have a material safety data sheet for each hazardous chemical which they used: (a) The employer did not have the safety data sheets for hazardous chemicals in the workplace such as but not limited to forklift batteries that contained acid.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Feb 27, 2018
- Abate by
- Apr 13, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: (a) Employees have not received hazard communication, including (global harmonization system), training and information on the chemicals they handle, such as but not limited to forklift batteries.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at Breakthru Beverage Wisconsin Metro-Milwaukee, LLC
View Breakthru Beverage Wisconsin Metro-Milwaukee, LLC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 424820)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342692621.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.