Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: JOSE PEREZ

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of JOSE PEREZ in 15081 BELHAVEN, GULFPORT, MS 39503 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 342699246.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Jose Perez — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Jose Perez is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
JOSE PEREZ
Site address
15081 BELHAVEN
City
GULFPORT
State
MS
ZIP
39503
Mailing
522 WEST OLD PASS RD., LONG BEACH, MS 39560
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.452 M02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 8, 2017
Abate by
Nov 13, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,803 · Current $2,269 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.452(m)(2): Crawling boards were not secured to the roof by ridge hooks or by means that met equivalent criteria (e.g., strength and durability).    (a) South side of house on roof - On or about October 12, 2017 an employee was carrying bundles of roofing shingles up house roof using a extension ladder as a crawling board that was not secured to the roof to keep it from dislodging.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2269
  • — Z (S) $3803

1926.501 B11

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Nov 8, 2017
Abate by
Nov 13, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,803 · Current $2,269 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11): Each employee on a steep roof with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected from falling by guardrail systems with toeboards, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems:    (a) Top of house roof - On or about October 12, 2017 employees applying roofing shingles to house roof 10 feet high on steep roof with no fall protection exposing them to fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2269
  • — Z (S) $3803

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Nov 8, 2017
Abate by
Nov 13, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,173 · Current $1,293 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:    (a) South, West and North side of the house - On or about October 12, 2017 employees using aluminum extension ladders to gain access to the roof did not extend 3 feet past the roofs edge to allow for a safe access.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1293
  • — Z (S) $2173

1926.1053 B04

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 8, 2017
Abate by
Nov 13, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4): Ladder(s) were used for purposes other than the purpose for which they were designed:  (a) South side of house on roof - On or about October 12, 2017 employee was using an aluminum extension ladder that was lying down on the roof to carry roofing material to top of roof.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B22

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 8, 2017
Abate by
Nov 13, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,803 · Current $2,269 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(22): Employees  using ladders were carrying objects or loads that could cause the employee to lose balance and fall:    (a) Top of roof on south side - On or about October 12, 2017 employee was using an aluminum ladder that was lying down on the steep slope of the roof carrying a bundle of roofing shingles to the top of the roofs edge had tripped and almost fell.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2269
  • — Z (S) $3803

1926.1060 A

Other-than-serious 4 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Nov 8, 2017
Abate by
Nov 13, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways and train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards.  (a) Around job site - On or about October 12, 2017 the employer failed to provide ladder training for his employees that were using the ladders to gain access to the roof and carry material to the top of the roof. All 4 ladders used by employees and employer were not placed in accordance to OSHA regulations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Jose Perez's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342699246.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.