Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: HARRELL AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of HARRELL AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS, INC. in 130 HUGH ROAD, LEESBURG, GA 31763 (NAICS 333111). OSHA activity number 342719622.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Harrell Agricultural Products, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Harrell Agricultural Products, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
130 HUGH ROAD
City
LEESBURG
State
GA
ZIP
31763
Mailing
130 HUGH ROAD, LEESBURG, GA 31763
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
333111
Employees
30
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Apr 6, 2018
Abate by
May 2, 2018
Penalty
Initial $9,054 · Current $4,527 Reduced
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees.    a). Shop Area & Outdoors - On or about and times prior to October 19, 2017, the employer allowed employees to operate a Toyota forklift (model: 7FGU25), a Caterpillar forklift (model: GP30K), a JCB forklift (Type: 550-140), and a Toyota forklift (model: 7FBCU25) without the use of the seatbelt, thus exposing employees to an ejection hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4527
  • — Z (S) $9054

1910.178 P01

Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 8 exposed
Issued
Apr 6, 2018
Abate by
May 2, 2018
Penalty
Initial $9,054 · Current $4,527 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(p)(1): Powered industrial truck(s) found to be in need of repair, defective, or in any way unsafe had not been  taken out of service until restored to safe operating condition(s).    a). Shop Area - On or about and times prior to October 19, 2017, a Toyota forklift (model: 7FGU25) was operated with a damaged fork and an inoperable seatbelt, thus exposing employees to a struck-by and ejection hazard.    b). Shop Area - On or about and times prior to October 19, 2017, a Caterpillar forklift (model: GP30K) was operated with a damaged fork and inoperable horn, thus exposing employees to a struck-by hazard.    c). Outdoors - On or about and times prior to October 19, 2017, a JCB forklift (Type: 550-140) was operated with an inoperable seatbelt, thus exposing employees to an ejection hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4527
  • — Z (S) $9054

1910.178 Q07

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Apr 6, 2018
Abate by
May 2, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(7): Industrial trucks were not examined before being placed in service.  a). Shop Area & Outdoors - On or about and times prior to October 19, 2017, a Toyota forklift (model: 7FGU25), a Caterpillar forklift (model: GP30K), and a JCB forklift (Type: 550-140) were not inspected prior to use, thus exposing employees to struck-by and ejection hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 F03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Apr 6, 2018
Abate by
May 2, 2018
Penalty
Initial $7,760 · Current $3,880 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(3): Scaffolds and scaffold components were not inspected for visible defects by a competent person before each work shift, and after any occurrence which could affect a scaffold's structural integrity. [General Industry Reference: 29 CFR 1910.27(a)]    a). Shop Area - On or about and times prior to October 19, 2017, mobile scaffolding units were not inspected by a competent person prior to use, thus exposing employees to a fall hazard up to approximately 7 feet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3880
  • — Z (S) $7760

1926.451 F04

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Apr 6, 2018
Abate by
May 2, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(4): Part(s) of a scaffold that were damaged or weakened, such that the scaffold's strength was less than that required by paragraph (a) of this section, were not immediately repaired, replaced, braced to meet those provisions, nor removed from service until repaired. [General Industry Reference: 29 CFR 1910.27(a)]  a). Shop Area - On or about and times prior to October 19, 2017, the locking mechanism on two wheels of a Werner Steel Rolling Scaffold (model: SRS-72) were not functional, thus exposing employees to a fall hazard of approximately 5 feet 11 inches.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.452 W02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 6, 2018
Abate by
May 2, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.452(w)(2): Scaffold casters and wheels were not locked with positive wheel and/or wheel and swivel locks, or equivalent means, to prevent movement of the scaffold while the scaffold was used in a stationary manner.[General Industry Reference: 29 CFR 1910.27(a)]  a). Shop Area - On or about and times prior to October 19, 2017, two wheels on the green-colored mobile scaffold were not equipped with a locking mechanism to prevent movement when the scaffold was in use, thus exposing employees to a fall hazard of approximately 7 feet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 L05

Other-than-serious 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Apr 6, 2018
Abate by
May 2, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(5): The employer did not evaluate the competency of the operator who had previously received training appropriate to the truck and working conditions encountered.    a). Shop Area & Outdoors - On or about and times prior to October 19, 2017, the employer did not evaluate the competency of all employees who operated forklifts, thus exposing employees to a programmatic hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Harrell Agricultural Products, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342719622.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.