NAPLES, FL —
OSHA Inspection: KNA ENTERPRISES, INC.
Federal Agency inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a federal Agency safety inspection of KNA ENTERPRISES, INC. in NW CORNER OF LIVINSTAON AND PINE RIDGE ROADS, NAPLES, FL 34109 (NAICS 238990). OSHA activity number 342726056.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- KNA ENTERPRISES, INC.
- Site address
- NW CORNER OF LIVINSTAON AND PINE RIDGE ROADS
- City
- NAPLES
- State
- FL
- ZIP
- 34109
- Mailing
- 1972 WOLFORD ROAD, CLEARWATER, FL 33760
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Federal Agency (M)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238990
- Employees
- 11
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 D01
- Issued
- Jul 3, 2018
- Abate by
- Jul 23, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $415 · Current $415
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required. a) On or about October 6, 2017, the employer failed to submit documentation and certification of corrective action for Citation 1 item 1, issued on April 4, 2018 with an abatement due date of April 23, 2018. b) On or about October 6, 2017, the employer failed to submit documentation and certification of corrective action for Citation 1 item 2, issued on April 4, 2018 with an abatement due date of April 23, 2018. c) On or about October 6, 2017, the employer failed to submit documentation and certification of corrective action for Citation 1 item 3, issued on April 4, 2018 with an abatement due date of April 23, 2018. d) On or about October 6, 2017, the employer failed to submit documentation and certification of corrective action for Citation 1 item 4, issued on April 4, 2018 with an abatement due date of April 23, 2018. e) On or about October 6, 2017, the employer failed to submit documentation and certification of corrective action for Citation 1 item 5, issued on April 4, 2018 with an abatement due date of April 23, 2018. f) On or about October 6, 2017, the employer failed to submit documentation and certification of corrective action for Citation 2 item 1, issued on April 4, 2018 with an abatement due date of April 23, 2018.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $415
1926.251 E08 III
- Issued
- Apr 4, 2018
- Abate by
- Apr 23, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $5,174 · Current $5,174
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.251(e)(8)(iii): Synthetic web sling(s) were not immediately removed from service when snags, punctures, tears, or cuts were present: On or about October 6, 2017, at the above addressed jobsite, the employer permitted employees to use a sling that was torn in multiple areas to hoist light poles, exposing employees to struck-by hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $5174
1926.1408 A02
- Issued
- Apr 4, 2018
- Abate by
- Apr 23, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $12,934 · Current $12,934
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1408(a)(2): Determine if any part of the equipment, load line or load (including rigging and lifting accessories), if operated up to the equipment's maximum working radius in the work zone, could get closer than 20 feet to a power line. If so, the employer must meet the requirements in Option (1), Option (2), or Option (3) of this section, as follows: On or about October 6, 2017, at the above addressed jobsite, the employer did not determine if any part of the crane, load line, or load (light pole) could get closer then 20 feet to a 13.2 KV power line, exposing the employees to a shock hazard.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $12934
1926.1408 G01 I F
- Issued
- Apr 4, 2018
- Abate by
- Apr 23, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $5,174 · Current $5,174
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1408(g)(1)(i)(F): Safe clearance distance from power lines: On or about October 6, 2017, at the above addressed jobsite, the employer did not train employees on the safe working distances and how to maintain those distances from overhead power lines.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $5174
1926.1417 W
- Issued
- Apr 4, 2018
- Abate by
- Apr 23, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $5,174 · Current $5,174
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1417(w): 29 CFR 1926.1417(w): The employer did not use a tag or restraint line when necessary to prevent rotation of the load that would be hazardous. On or about October 6, 2017, at the above addressed jobsite, the employer did not use a restraint line attached to the lamp arm that would have prevented the load from rotating into the adjacent overhead power lines.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $5174
1926.1433 D04 I
- Issued
- Apr 4, 2018
- Abate by
- Apr 23, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $5,174 · Current $5,174
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1433(d)(4)(i): The employer did not ensure that the hook used during hoisting was equipped with a safety latch. On or about October 6, 2017, at the above addressed jobsite, the employer did not ensure that the hook used during the hoisting of the light pole was equipped with a safety latch.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $5174
1926.1417 C01
- Issued
- Apr 4, 2018
- Abate by
- Apr 23, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1417(c)(1): 29 CFR 1926.1417(c)(1): The procedures applicable to the operation of the equipment, including rated capacities (load charts), recommended operating speeds, special hazard warnings, instructions, and operator's manual, were not readily available in the cab at all times for use by the operator. On or about October 6, 2017, at the above addressed jobsite, the employer did not have the operator's manual readily available in the cab.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at KNA Enterprises, INC.
View KNA Enterprises, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238990)
More inspections in FL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342726056.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.