Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: BALLYMORE COMPANY, INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of BALLYMORE COMPANY, INC. in 501 GUNNARD CARLSON DRIVE, COATESVILLE, PA 19320 (NAICS 332999). OSHA activity number 342778628.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Ballymore Company, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Ballymore Company, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
501 GUNNARD CARLSON DRIVE
City
COATESVILLE
State
PA
ZIP
19320
Mailing
501 GUNNARD CARLSON DRIVE, COATESVILLE, PA 19320
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332999
Employees
70
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 16, 2018
Abate by
Jul 3, 2018
Penalty
Initial $6,467 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  a) Facility: The employer did not have a written respiratory protection program for employees required to  wear tightfitting respirators such as, but not limited to the Sperian Opti-Fit Full Face 762000 respirator with organic vapor cartridges, 3M 8661P15-DC, ect.,while conducting powder coating operations.  Condition observed/noted on/about 12 APR 2018.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $6467

1910.134 F02

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
May 16, 2018
Abate by
May 29, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): The employer shall ensure that an employee using a tight-fitting facepiece respirator is fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator, whenever a different respirator facepiece (size, style, model or make) is used, and at least annually thereafter.  a) Facility, where powder coating operations are conducted: The employer did not provide respirator fit testing for employees required to wear tight fitting respirators such as: Sperian Opti-Fit Full Face 762000 respirator, 3M Home Dust Mask - 8661P15-DC, ect. while performing powder coating operations in the spray booths.      Condition observed/noted on/about 12 APR 2018.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 H02 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 16, 2018
Abate by
May 22, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $3,880
29 CFR 1910.134(h)(2)(i): Respirators were not stored to protect them from damage, contamination, dust, sunlight, extreme temperatures, excessive moisture, and damaging chemicals or  were not packed or stored to prevent deformation of the facepiece and exhalation valve:     a) Facility, spray booth: The employer did not ensure that respirators, required to use by employees to perform powder coating operations, were properly stored to protect from damage, dust, and/or contamination. Respirators were hung by the straps above the powder coating storage area near the spray booth without being protected from contamination.     This condition noted/observed on/about 12 APR 2018.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $3880.2
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1000 A02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 16, 2018
Abate by
Jun 12, 2018
Penalty
Initial $7,760 · Current $5,044 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1000(a)(2): Employee(s) were exposed to an airborne concentration of Particulates Not Otherwise Regulated (PNOR) listed in Table Z-1 in excess of the 8 hour Time Weighted Average concentration of 15 mg/m3 :    a) Powder Coating Booth: Employee(s) performing spray powder coating operations were exposed to Particulates Not Otherwise Regulated (PNOR) at a concentration of 45.135 mg/m^3 as an 8 hour time-weighted average (TWA), which was 3.009 times the Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL) of 15 mg/m^3. Employee exposures were derived from samples collected for 438 minutes, with zero exposure assumed for all unsampled time periods.    This violation was measured on/about 12 APR 2018.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $5044
  • — Z (S) $7760

1910.1000 E

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 16, 2018
Abate by
Jul 3, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9135

29 CFR 1910.1000(e): Feasible administrative or engineering controls were not determined and implemented to achieve compliance with the limits prescribed in 29 CFR 1910.1000(a) through (d):    a) Facility, spray booth: Engineering controls were not implemented to achieve compliance when an employee was overexposed to Particulates Not Otherwise Regulated (PNOR). While performing powder coating operations in the spray booth an employee was exposed during a 438 minute sample, to PNOR concentration of 45.135mg/m^3 as an 8 hour time weighted average (TWA). This is 3.009 times the PEL of 15mg/m^3. Employee exposure were derived from samples collected for 438 minutes, with zero exposure assumed for all unsampled time periods.      This violation was measured on/about 12 APR 2018.    Abatement Note: General methods of control applicable for the circumstances include, but not limited to the following:    1) Redesign and implement an effective ventilation system for the spray booth to handle the volume of powder coat used; the Nordson Econo-Coat can be equipped with additional air handling units to increase functionality.   2) Develop and implement a maintenance program for the Nordson Econo-Coat to ensure adequate functionality, which includes cleaning procedures for filters and a regular change schedule.  3) Perform air monitoring/sampling to assure the adequate protection and controls.  4) Provide employees training on the hazards and health symptoms associated with inhaling high levels of powder coat, including proper use and maintenance of ventilation system.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 16, 2018
Abate by
May 29, 2018
Penalty
Initial $6,467 · Current $4,204 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:    a) Facility, spray booth area: The employer did not ensure that employees performing powder coating operations were trained on the hazards associated with hazardous chemicals used on site, including, but not limited to: crystalline silica, calcium carbonate, carbon black, and titanium dioxide contained in the Protech powder coat.     This condition was noted on/about 16 NOV 2017.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $4203.55
  • — Z (S) $6467

View Ballymore Company, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342778628.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.