VERMILION, OH —
OSHA Inspection: IRG OPERATING LLC
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of IRG OPERATING LLC in 850 WEST RIVER ROAD, VERMILION, OH 44089 (NAICS 327991). OSHA activity number 342794401.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- IRG OPERATING LLC
- Site address
- 850 WEST RIVER ROAD
- City
- VERMILION
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 44089
- Mailing
- 850 WEST RIVER ROAD, VERMILION, OH 44089
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 327991
- Employees
- 30
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.147 C07 I
- Issued
- Apr 3, 2018
- Abate by
- May 17, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $6,467 · Current $3,234 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i): The employer did not provide training to ensure that the purpose and function of the energy control program were understood by employees and that the knowledge and skills required for the safe application, usage, and removal of the energy controls were acquired by employees. a. On November 28, 2017, the employer did not ensure an employee greasing the saw drive shaft bearings for the Wilson saw located in Plant 1 was trained on the company's lockout program. Training did not include the following: a. The recognition of applicable hazardous energy sources; b. The type and magnitude of the energy available in the workplace; c. The methods and means necessary for energy isolation and control
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3234
- — Z (S) $6467
1910.147 D
- Issued
- Apr 3, 2018
- Abate by
- May 17, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(d): The established procedures for the application of energy control (the lockout or tagout procedures) did not cover the following elements and actions and were not done in the following sequence. a. On November 28, 2017, the employer did not ensure an employee locked out the Wilson saw in Plant 2 prior to greasing the saw drive shaft bearings. The employee was exposed to rotational hazards of the drive shaft and the saw blade if the saw were to be energized. b. On December 18, 2017, the employer did not ensure that the blade movement on the Park saw, located in Plant 2 was locked out when conducting set up activities. c. On December 18, 2017, the employer did not ensure that the blade movement of the Wilson saw, located in plant 1 was locked out when conducting set up activities. d. On November 28, 2017, the employer did not ensure that the blade movement on the GMM#2 saw in plant 1 was locked out when conducting set up activities.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.178 Q01
- Issued
- Apr 3, 2018
- Abate by
- Apr 12, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $6,467 · Current $3,233 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(1): Any power-operated industrial truck not in safe operating condition was not removed from service. a. On November 28, 2017, the employer did not ensure the Mitsubishi forklift located in plant 2 was removed from service. During the inspection it was determined the forklift's emergency brake and horn were not functioning. b. On November 28, 2017, the employer did not ensure the Utilift forklift #UT30P located in plant 1 was removed from service. During the inspection it was determined the forklift's emergency brake was not functioning.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3233
- — Z (S) $6467
1910.178 Q07
- Issued
- Apr 3, 2018
- Abate by
- Apr 12, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(7): Industrial trucks were not examined before being placed in service, and were placed in service when the examination showed any condition adversely affecting the safety of the vehicle. Such examinations were not made at least daily. Where industrial trucks are used on a round-the-clock basis, they were not examined after each shift. Defects when found were not immediately reported and corrected. a. On November 28, 2017, the employer did not ensure the Mitsubishi forklift located in plant 2 was inspected on a daily basis. During the inspection it was determined the forklifts emergency brake and horn were not functioning. b. On November 28, 2017, the employer did not ensure the Utilift forklift #UT30P located in plant 1 was inspected on a daily basis. During the inspection it was determined the forklifts emergency brake was not functioning.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Apr 3, 2018
- Abate by
- May 3, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $6,467 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. a. On December 18, 2017, the employer did not ensure an employee placing new sand stone blocks and squaring up sand stone blocks on the Park saw, located in Plant 2, were protected from the potential activation of the saw by providing adequate machine guarding. b. On December 18, 2017, the employer did not ensure an employee placing new sand stone blocks and squaring up sand stone blocks on the Wilson saw, located in Plant 1, were protected from the potential activation of the saw by providing adequate machine guarding. c. On November 28, 2017, the employer did not ensure an employee placing new sand stone blocks and positioning for the first cut on sand stone blocks on GMM #2 saw, located in Plant 1, were protected from the potential activation of the saw by providing adequate machine guarding.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $6467
1910.178 A05
- Issued
- Apr 3, 2018
- Abate by
- Sep 26, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(a)(5): If the truck is equipped with front-end attachments other than factory installed attachments, the user did not request that the truck be marked to identify the attachments and show the approximate weight of the truck and attachment combination at maximum elevation with load laterally centered. a. On November 28, 2017, the employer did not ensure the Taylor forklift located in Plant 2 was equipped with a new data plate which showed the capacity and the load center of the manufactured boom used to lift large sections of sandstone.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at IRG Operating LLC
View IRG Operating LLC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 327991)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342794401.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.