Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: BUDZAR INDUSTRIES

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of BUDZAR INDUSTRIES in 38241 WILLOUGHBY PKWY, WILLOUGHBY, OH 44094 (NAICS 333415). OSHA activity number 342838232.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Budzar Industries — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Budzar Industries is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
BUDZAR INDUSTRIES
Site address
38241 WILLOUGHBY PKWY
City
WILLOUGHBY
State
OH
ZIP
44094
Mailing
38241 WILLOUGHBY PKWY, WILLOUGHBY, OH 44094
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
333415
Employees
110
Ownership type
A

13 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 7, 2018
Abate by
Apr 11, 2018
Penalty
Initial $4,989 · Current $2,993 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:    On or about December 15, 2017, employees were required wear tight-fitting half-face respirators while preforming spray painting operations. However, the company had not implemented a written respiratory protection program.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2993.4
  • — Z (S) $4989

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 7, 2018
Abate by
Apr 11, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  On or about December 15, 2017, employees were required wear tight-fitting half-face respirators while preforming spray painting operations and have not received a medical evaluation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 7, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):  On or about December 15, 2017, employees were required wear tight-fitting half-face respirators while preforming spray painting operations and have not received a fit test.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 7, 2018
Abate by
Apr 11, 2018
Penalty
Initial $4,989 · Current $2,993 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1): The employer did not provide effective training to ensure that each employee could demonstrate knowledge of 1910.134(k)(1)(i) - (vii):    On or about December 15, 2017, employees were required wear tight-fitting half-face respirators while preforming spray painting operations. Employees have not received respiratory protection training in accordance with the standard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2993.4
  • — Z (S) $4989

1910.134 K06

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 110 exposed
Issued
Mar 7, 2018
Abate by
Apr 11, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(6): The employer did not provide the basic advisory information on respirators, as presented in Appendix D of 29 CFR 1910.134, in written or oral format to employees who wear respirators when such use was not required by the employer:  On or about December 15, 2017, the employer did not provide employees with Appendix D of the respiratory standard when voluntarily using respirators including, but not limited to, dust masks and tight-fitting half-face respirators.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 110 exposed
Issued
Mar 7, 2018
Penalty
Initial $11,641 · Current $6,985 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:    On or about December 15, 2017, the employer did not have a written hazard communication program. Employees work with chemicals including, but not limited to, stainless steel, carbon steel, Industrial Enamel, Kem 400 Enamel, Kem Aqua 280 Water Reducible Enamel, spray adhesive, Glastherm, cutting oil, and cleaning agents.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $6984.6
  • — Z (S) $11641

1910.1200 F06 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 110 exposed
Issued
Mar 7, 2018
Abate by
Apr 11, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(6)(i): Except as provided in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(7) and 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(8), the employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the information required by 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(1)(i) through 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(1)(v):  On or about December 15, 2017, the employer did not ensure that secondary containers containing RidgidNu-Clear Thread Cutting Oil, BH-38 cleaning agent, and Dawn cleaning agent were labeled with the identity of the chemicals.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 110 exposed
Issued
Mar 7, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  On or about December 15, 2017, the employer did not provide hazard communication training for regular and temporary employees. Employees work with chemicals including, but not limited to, stainless steel, carbon steel, Industrial Enamel, Kem 400 Enamel, Kem Aqua 280 Water Reducible Enamel, spray adhesive, Glastherm, cutting oil, and cleaning agents.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 110 exposed
Issued
Mar 7, 2018
Abate by
Apr 11, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify, through a written certification, the identity of the workplace evaluated, the person certifying that the evaluation had been performed, and the date the hazard assessment was done:  On or about December 15, 2017, the workplace hazard assessment had not been put in writing and certified with the person conducting the evaluation and the dates the hazard assessment was completed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.132 F01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 110 exposed
Issued
Mar 7, 2018
Abate by
Apr 11, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(f)(1): The employer did not provide training to each employee who is required by this section to use personal protective equipment:  On or about December15, 2017, employees were provided personal protective equipment. Regular and temporary employees have not received training in accordance with the standard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.157 G02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 110 exposed
Issued
Mar 7, 2018
Abate by
Apr 11, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.157(g)(2): The educational program to familiarize employees with the general principles of fire extinguisher use and the hazards involved with incipient stage fire fighting was not provided to all employees upon initial employment, and at least annually thereafter:  On or about December 15, 2017, the employer did not provide initial and/or annual training on the emergency action plan in case of fire. The employer expects regular and temporary employees to fight fires, however employees are not trained on fire extinguishers and/or building evacuation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.157 E02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 110 exposed
Issued
Mar 7, 2018
Abate by
Apr 11, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.157(e)(2): Portable fire extinguishers were not visually inspected at least monthly:  On or about December 15, 2017, the employer did not visually inspect fire extinguishers at least monthly.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.157 E03

Other-than-serious 1 instance 110 exposed
Issued
Mar 7, 2018
Abate by
Apr 11, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.157(e)(3): Portable fire extinguishers were not subjected to an annual maintenance check:  On or about December 15, 2017, the employer did not perform annual fire extinguisher maintenance.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Budzar Industries's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342838232.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.