PLAIN CITY, OH —
OSHA Inspection: JOSE MORA
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of JOSE MORA in 10339 IVY CHASE LOT 509, PLAIN CITY, OH 43064 (NAICS 238170). OSHA activity number 342847381.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- JOSE MORA
- Site address
- 10339 IVY CHASE LOT 509
- City
- PLAIN CITY
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 43064
- Mailing
- 1505 BYRD DRIVE, COLUMBUS, OH 43219
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238170
- Employees
- 8
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.20 B01
- Issued
- Jan 12, 2018
- Abate by
- Feb 2, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $3,880 · Current $1,940 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): It shall be the responsibility of the employer to initiate and maintain such programs as may be necessary to comply with this part. a. On or before December 20, 2017 where employees were working at heights of 12 feet, 3 inches, the employer failed to maintain a fall protection program, thereby exposing the employees to fall hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1940
- — Z (S) $3880
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Jan 12, 2018
- Abate by
- Jan 25, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $3,880 · Current $1,940 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems. a. On or before December 20, 2017 where employees were installing siding to the exterior of a house while working from the porch roof, the employees were not protected from falls, thereby being exposed to a 12 foot, 3 inch fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1940
- — Z (S) $3880
More inspections at Jose Mora
View Jose Mora's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238170)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342847381.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.