Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: GARDNER PET GROUP, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of GARDNER PET GROUP, INC. in 2845 WINGATE ST., WEST BEND, WI 53095 (NAICS 453910). OSHA activity number 342861655.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Gardner PET Group, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Gardner PET Group, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
2845 WINGATE ST.
City
WEST BEND
State
WI
ZIP
53095
Mailing
2845 WINGATE ST., WEST BEND, WI 53095
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
453910
Employees
64
Ownership type
A

1 citation on file for this inspection.

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 4 instances 20 exposed
Issued
Feb 27, 2018
Abate by
Mar 5, 2018
Penalty
Initial $5,497 · Current $3,848 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks.  (a) Machine guarding was not provided to protect employees from  ingoing nip points and rotating parts hazards. The "Puppy Pad machine 1" was set up with interlocks but the employer did not insure that they were functional during operations. This exposed the employees to caught in hazards while clearing the machine housing of overrun product.  (b) Machine guarding was not provided to protect employees from  ingoing nip points and rotating parts hazards. The "Puppy Pad machine 2" was set up with interlocks but the employer did not insure that they were functional during operations. This exposed the employees to caught in hazards while clearing the machine housing of overrun product.   (c) Machine guarding was not provided to protect employees from  ingoing nip points and rotating parts hazards. The "Puppy Pad machine 3" was set up with interlocks but the employer did not insure that they were functional during operations. This exposed the employees to caught in hazards while clearing the machine housing of overrun product.   (d) Machine guarding was not provided to protect employees from  ingoing nip points and rotating parts hazards. The "Puppy Pad machine 4" was set up with interlocks but the employer did not insure that they were functional during operations. This exposed the employees to caught in hazards while clearing the machine housing of overrun product.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3847.9
  • — Z (S) $5497

View Gardner PET Group, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342861655.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.