SAINT AUGUSTINE, FL —
OSHA Inspection: EMZ CONSTRUCTION, INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of EMZ CONSTRUCTION, INC. in 126 PALISADES DRIVE, SAINT AUGUSTINE, FL 32092 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 342906088.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- EMZ CONSTRUCTION, INC.
- Site address
- 126 PALISADES DRIVE
- City
- SAINT AUGUSTINE
- State
- FL
- ZIP
- 32092
- Mailing
- 6612 BREEZE WAY BRANDYWOOD APT 6612, ORLANDO, FL 32807
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Jun 25, 2018
- Abate by
- Aug 10, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $726 · Current $726
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): 29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer failed to certify to OSHA (the Agency) that the following item(s) were abated within 10 calendar days after the abatement date: a. On or about March 8, 2018, the employer failed to provide documentation and certification of abatement for violations that occurred on January 25, 2018 at the job site located at 126, Palisades Drive, Florida 32092.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $726
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Feb 26, 2018
- Abate by
- Mar 8, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $3,880 · Current $3,880
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Employees were not provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations present potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents: a) On or about January 25, 2018: An employees was operating a pneumatic nail gun while performing framing activities and was not provided with eye protection. The employee was building a creek on the garage roof area. Employees was exposed to eye injuries. b) On or about January 25, 2018: An employees was using a pneumatic nail gun while performing framing activities and was not provided with eye protection. The employee was performing finishes to a box detail at the front of the house. Employees was exposed to eye injuries.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3880
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Feb 26, 2018
- Abate by
- Mar 8, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $9,054 · Current $9,054
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): a) On or about January 25, 2018: An employee was observed installing roof sheathing at a height of 20-feet and a roof pitch of about 6:12 and the employee was not protected by guardrail system, safety net, or personal fall arrest system, nor was employee provided with an alternative fall protection measure. Employee was exposed to a 20-feet fall hazard. b) On or about January 25, 2018: An employee was observed installing a creek at the garage area at a height of 10-feet and the employee was not protected by guardrail system, safety net, or personal fall arrest system, nor was employee provided with an alternative fall protection measure. Employee was exposed to a 10-feet fall hazard. c) On or about January 25, 2018: An employee was observed performing finishes to a box detail at the front of the house at a height of 10-feet and the employee was not protected by guardrail system, safety net, or personal fall arrest system, nor was employee provided with an alternative fall protection measure. Employee was exposed to a 10-feet fall hazard.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $9054
1926.1052 C01 II
- Issued
- Feb 26, 2018
- Abate by
- Mar 8, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $6,467 · Current $6,467
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1052(c)(1)(ii): Stairways having four or more risers or rising more than 30 inches (76 cm), whichever is less, were not equipped with a stairrail system along each unprotected side or edge: a) On or about January 25, 2018: Employees were using a stairway to access the second floor and it was not provided with a stairrail. Employees were exposed to a fall hazard.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $6467
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Feb 26, 2018
- Abate by
- Mar 8, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: a) On or about January 25, 2018: Three employees were observed performing framing activities at heights higher than 6-feet from next lower level which exposed them to a fall hazard and such employees were not provided with training that will allow them to recognized such hazards and equipped them on how to minimized them.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at EMZ Construction, INC.
View EMZ Construction, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in FL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342906088.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.