Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: EMZ CONSTRUCTION, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of EMZ CONSTRUCTION, INC. in 126 PALISADES DRIVE, SAINT AUGUSTINE, FL 32092 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 342906088.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch EMZ Construction, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for EMZ Construction, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
126 PALISADES DRIVE
City
SAINT AUGUSTINE
State
FL
ZIP
32092
Mailing
6612 BREEZE WAY BRANDYWOOD APT 6612, ORLANDO, FL 32807
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 60 exposed
Issued
Jun 25, 2018
Abate by
Aug 10, 2018
Penalty
Initial $726 · Current $726
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): 29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1):   The employer failed to certify to OSHA (the Agency) that the following item(s) were abated within 10 calendar days after the abatement date:  a. On or about March 8, 2018, the employer failed to provide documentation and certification of abatement for violations that occurred on January 25, 2018 at the job site located at 126, Palisades Drive, Florida 32092.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $726

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 1 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 26, 2018
Abate by
Mar 8, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,880 · Current $3,880
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Employees were not provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations present potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents:  a) On or about January 25, 2018: An employees was operating a pneumatic nail gun while performing framing activities and was not provided with eye protection. The employee was building a creek on the garage roof area. Employees was exposed to eye injuries.   b) On or about January 25, 2018: An employees was using a pneumatic nail gun while performing framing activities and was not provided with eye protection. The employee was performing finishes to a box detail at the front of the house.  Employees was exposed to eye injuries.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3880

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 26, 2018
Abate by
Mar 8, 2018
Penalty
Initial $9,054 · Current $9,054
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):   a) On or about January 25, 2018: An employee was observed installing roof sheathing at a height of 20-feet and a roof pitch of about 6:12 and the employee was not protected by guardrail system, safety net, or personal fall arrest system, nor was employee provided with an alternative fall protection measure. Employee was exposed to a 20-feet fall hazard.   b) On or about January 25, 2018: An employee was observed installing a creek at the garage area at a height of 10-feet and the employee was not protected by guardrail system, safety net, or personal fall arrest system, nor was employee provided with an alternative fall protection measure. Employee was exposed to a 10-feet fall hazard.   c) On or about January 25, 2018: An employee was observed performing finishes to a box detail at the front of the house at a height of 10-feet and the employee was not protected by guardrail system, safety net, or personal fall arrest system, nor was employee provided with an alternative fall protection measure. Employee was exposed to a 10-feet fall hazard.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $9054

1926.1052 C01 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 26, 2018
Abate by
Mar 8, 2018
Penalty
Initial $6,467 · Current $6,467
29 CFR 1926.1052(c)(1)(ii): Stairways having four or more risers or rising more than 30 inches (76 cm), whichever is less, were not equipped with a stairrail system along each unprotected side or edge:  a) On or about January 25, 2018: Employees were using a stairway to access the second floor and it was not provided with a stairrail. Employees were exposed to a fall hazard.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $6467

1926.503 A01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 26, 2018
Abate by
Mar 8, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  a) On or about January 25, 2018: Three employees were observed performing framing activities at heights higher than 6-feet from next lower level which exposed them to a fall hazard and such employees were not provided with training that will allow them to recognized such hazards and equipped them on how to minimized them.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

View EMZ Construction, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342906088.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.