Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: STOKES WOODWORKING CO., INC.

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of STOKES WOODWORKING CO., INC. in 12 BONAZZOLI AVE., HUDSON, MA 01749 (NAICS 337110). OSHA activity number 342912607.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Stokes Woodworking CO., INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Stokes Woodworking CO., INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
12 BONAZZOLI AVE.
City
HUDSON
State
MA
ZIP
01749
Mailing
12 BONAZZOLI AVE., HUDSON, MA 01749
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
337110
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 23, 2018
Abate by
Oct 31, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,772 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): General. The employer shall provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee is fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace.     Location - painting shop    On or about January 26, 2018, employer did not ensure that employees required to wear respirator are medically evaluated to prevent injury. Employees wore half face air purifying respirator without being medically evaluated for working with chemical hazards, such as, but not limited to acetone, methyl isobutyl ketone, titanium dioxide, and toluene.
Recent events (6)
  • — F $3200
  • — C $11366
  • — Z $11366

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 23, 2018
Abate by
Oct 31, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator:    Location - painting shop    On or about January 26, 2018, employer did not ensure that employee required to wear tight fitting respirator are fit tested. Employees wore half face air purifying respirator without fit testing for working with chemical hazards, such as, but not limited to acetone, methyl isobutyl ketone, titanium dioxide, and toluene.
Recent events (6)
  • — F $0
  • — C $0
  • — Z $0

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 23, 2018
Abate by
Oct 31, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,217 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f) labeling, (g) safety data sheets, and (h) training will be met:    Location - painting shop    On or about January 26, 2018, a written hazard communication program was not developed and implemented where products, such as paint, primer, and thinner (contain acetone, methyl isobutyl ketone, and toluene) were used.
Recent events (6)
  • — F $3000
  • — C $13639
  • — Z $13639

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 23, 2018
Abate by
Oct 31, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:    Location - painting shop    On or about January 26, 2018, employer did not provide effective information and training for employees required to use hazardous chemical products, such as paint, primer, and thinner (contain acetone, methyl isobutyl ketone, and toluene) for painting process.
Recent events (6)
  • — F $0
  • — C $0
  • — Z $0

1910.134 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 23, 2018
Abate by
Oct 31, 2018
Penalty
Initial $311 · Current $200 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:    Location - Painting shop    On or about January 26, 2018, employer has not developed and implemented a written respiratory protection program for employees working with chemical hazards, such as, but not limited to acetone, methyl isobutyl ketone, titanium dioxide, and toluene.
Recent events (6)
  • — F $300
  • — C $1200
  • — Z $1200

1910.134 D01 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 23, 2018
Abate by
Oct 31, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer shall identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; this evaluation shall include a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazard(s) and an identification of the contaminant's chemical state and physical form.      Location - Painting shop    On or about January 26, 2018, the employer had not performed an evaluation or identification of respiratory hazards for chemical hazards, such as, but not limited to, acetone, methyl isobutyl ketone, titanium dioxide, and toluene.
Recent events (7)
  • — F $0
  • — P $0
  • — C $0

1910.134 G01 I A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 23, 2018
Abate by
Oct 31, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A): Respirators with tight-fitting facepieces were worn by employees who had facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face:    Location - Painting shop    On or about February 2, 2018, employer did not effectively enforce the absence of facial hair, thereby exposing employee to respiratory hazards, when employee wears half face air purifying respirator for working with chemical hazards, such as , but not limited to acetone, methyl isobutyl ketone, titanium dioxide, and toluene.
Recent events (6)
  • — F $0
  • — C $0
  • — Z $0

1910.134 K01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 23, 2018
Abate by
Oct 31, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1): The employer did not provide effective training to ensure that each employee could demonstrate knowledge of 1910.134(k)(1)(i) - (vii):    Location - painting shop    On or about January 26, 2018, employer did not provide information and training on proper use and care of respirator where production employee was wearing half face air purifying respirator for working with chemical hazards, such as, but not limited to acetone, methyl isobutyl ketone, titanium dioxide, and toluene.
Recent events (6)
  • — F $0
  • — C $0
  • — Z $0

View Stokes Woodworking CO., INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342912607.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.