Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: TURBO USA INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of TURBO USA INC. in 2950 SW 2ND AVE, FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33315 (NAICS 333618). OSHA activity number 342929353.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Turbo USA INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Turbo USA INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
TURBO USA INC.
Site address
2950 SW 2ND AVE
City
FORT LAUDERDALE
State
FL
ZIP
33315
Mailing
2950 SW 2ND AVE, FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33315
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
333618
Employees
11
Ownership type
A

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.212 A03 II

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 6, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,696 · Current $2,218 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s):   a. On or about 2/6/2018, at Bay #4 of the above addressed worksite, employees were exposed to a caught by hazard while working with a drill press (i.e. The American Tool Works, No serial number) that lacked a guard on its point of operation.  b. On or about 2/6/2018, at Bay #4 of the above addressed worksite, employees were exposed to a caught by hazard while working with a milling machine (i.e. MSC, No serial number available) that lacked a guard on its point of operation.  c. On or about 3/1/2018, at Bay #4 of the above addressed worksite, employees were exposed to a caught by hazard while working with a lathe (i.e. Yunnan Machine Tool Works, CY62508/2000) lacked a guard on its point of operation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2217.6
  • — Z (S) $3696

1910.213 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 6, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,141 · Current $1,885 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.213(c)(1): Circular handfed ripsaw(s) were not guarded by an automatically adjusting hood which completely enclosed that portion of the saw above the table and above the material being cut:  On or about 2/6/2018, at Bay #3 of the above addressed jobsite, an employee was exposed to a caught by hazard while working with a table saw (i.e. Porter Cable, Serial #011661) that lacked a guard over the blade.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1884.6
  • — Z (S) $3141

1910.213 C02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 6, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.213(c)(2): Hand-fed circular ripsaw(s) were not furnished with a spreader to prevent material from squeezing the saw or being thrown back on the operator:  On or about 2/6/2018, at Bay #3 of the above addressed jobsite, an employee was exposed to a struck by hazard while working with a table saw (i.e. Porter Cable, Serial #011661) that lacked a spreader.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.213 C03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 6, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.213(c)(3): Hand-fed ripsaw(s) did not have non kickback fingers or dogs so located as to oppose the thrust or tendency of the saw to pick up the material or to throw it back toward the operator:   On or about 2/6/2018, at Bay #3 of the above addressed jobsite, an employee was exposed to a struck by hazard while working with a table saw (i.e. Porter Cable, Serial #011661) that lacked non kickback fingers or dogs.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.215 A04

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 6, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,956 · Current $1,774 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(4): Work rest(s) on grinding machinery were not adjusted closely to the wheel with a maximum opening of one eighth inch:  On or about 2/6/2018, at Bay #4 of above addressed worksite, employees were exposed to a struck by hazard while working with a bench grinder (i.e. Dewalt, Serial No. 2012 48-YL80870) that had its left side work rest placed at a distance of 7/16-inch from the wheel.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1773.6
  • — Z (S) $2956

1910.215 B09

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 6, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9): The distance between the abrasive wheel periphery(s) and the adjustable tongue or the end of the safety guard peripheral member at the top exceeded one fourth inch:   On or about 2/6/2018, at Bay #4 of above addressed worksite, employees were exposed to a struck by hazard while working with a bench grinder (i.e. Dewalt, Serial No. 2012 48-YL80870) that had its left side tongue guard placed at a distance of 1/2-inch from the wheel.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.253 B02 IV

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 6, 2018
Penalty
Initial $1,885 · Current $1,131 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.253(b)(2)(iv): Valve protection caps, where cylinders were designed to accept caps, were not always in place, hand-tight, except when cylinders were in use or connected for use:  On or about 2/6/2018, at Bay #3 of the above addressed worksite, an oxygen cylinder was not capped, exposing employees to fire and explosion hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1131
  • — Z (S) $1885

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 6, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1):  The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  On or about 2/6/2018, at the above addressed worksite. The employer had not developed and implemented a written hazard communication program for protecting employees from a chemical hazard presented by products  (i.e. oxygen, acetone, acetylene, xylene, epoxies, enamels, lubricants, etc.) which are used for metal fabrication purposes on a daily basis.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 G08

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 6, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8):   The employer did not maintain in the workplace copies of the required safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical, and did not ensure that they were readily accessible during each work shift to employees when they were in their work area(s):  On or about 2/6/2018, at the above addressed worksite, the safety data sheets for chemicals (i.e. oxygen, acetone, acetylene, xylene, epoxies, enamels, lubricants, etc.) used for metal fabrication purposes were not maintained and/or accessible, exposing employees to a chemical hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 H01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 6, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  On or about 2/6/2018, at the above addressed worksite, employees were exposed to a chemical hazard while using products for metal fabrication purposes on a daily basis (i.e. oxygen, acetone, acetylene, xylene, epoxies, enamels, lubricants, etc.) while lacked training and information, as evidenced by, among other conditions; employees lacked knowledge of location and availability of the company's hazard communication program; employees lacked knowledge of the purpose, location and availability of the required safety data sheets, employees were not aware of the hazards presented by the chemicals, etc.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Turbo USA INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342929353.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.