VALLEY STREAM, NY —
OSHA Inspection: EAST COAST WALL COATINGS, INC
Unprogrammed Other inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Other safety inspection of EAST COAST WALL COATINGS, INC in 133 E. MERRICK RD, VALLEY STREAM, NY 11580 (NAICS 238990). OSHA activity number 342949906.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- EAST COAST WALL COATINGS, INC
- Site address
- 133 E. MERRICK RD
- City
- VALLEY STREAM
- State
- NY
- ZIP
- 11580
- Mailing
- 220 A FRANKLIN AVE, FRANKLIN SQUARE, NY 11010
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Unprogrammed Other (I)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238990
- Employees
- 7
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.451 B01
- Issued
- Mar 22, 2018
- Abate by
- Apr 11, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,772 · Current $1,664 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii) a) Worksite, north side of building - The employee was exposed to falling approximately 14 feet to the ground below. The scaffold had three planks installed; on or about 2/14/18. b) Worksite, west side of building - The employee was exposed to falling approximately 16 feet to the ground below. The scaffold had two planks installed; on or about 2/14/18. Note: Because the abatement of this violation is already documented in the case file, the employer need not submit certification of documentation of abatement for this violation as normally required by CFR 1903.19
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1664
- — Z (S) $2772
1926.451 E01
- Issued
- Mar 22, 2018
- Abate by
- Apr 11, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,772 · Current $1,664 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used. Cross braces were used as a means of access. a) Worksite, north side of building - The employees were accessing the second level of the fabricated frame scaffold by climbing on the end frames and cross bracing, exposing themselves to falls of approximately 14 feet to the ground below; on or about 2/14/18. Note: Because abatement of this violation is already documented in the case file, the employer need not submit certification of documentation of abatement for this violation as normally required by CFR 1903.19
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1664
- — Z (S) $2772
1926.451 G04 XV
- Issued
- Mar 22, 2018
- Abate by
- Apr 11, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,772 · Current $1,664 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(4)(xv): Crossbracing used in place of both a toprail and midrail was unacceptable. When the crossing point of two braces is between 38 inches (0.97 m) and 48 inches (1.3 m) above the work platform, this may be concentered as a toprail only. A midrail is required. a) Worksite, north side of building - The employees were observed working from the second tier of a fabricated frame scaffold, with only a crossbrace used in lieu of a toprail. A midrail was missing, exposing themselves to a fall of approximately 14 feet to the ground below on or about 2/14/18. Note: Because abatement of this violation is already documented in the case file, the employer need not submit certification of documentation of abatement for this violation as normally required by 29 CFR 1903.19.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1664
- — Z (S) $2772
More inspections at East Coast Wall Coatings, INC
View East Coast Wall Coatings, INC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238990)
More inspections in NY
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342949906.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.