Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: CENEX RENSSELAER TERMINAL LLC

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of CENEX RENSSELAER TERMINAL LLC in 54 RIVERSIDE AVE, RENSSELAER, NY 12144 (NAICS 325110). OSHA activity number 342989621.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Cenex Rensselaer Terminal LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Cenex Rensselaer Terminal LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
54 RIVERSIDE AVE
City
RENSSELAER
State
NY
ZIP
12144
Mailing
54 RIVERSIDE AVE, RENSSELAER, NY 12144
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
325110
Employees
10
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.119 E03 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Aug 23, 2018
Abate by
Mar 30, 2019
Penalty
Initial $9,239 · Current $6,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119(e)(3)(i): The Process Hazard Analysis did not address the hazards of the process    (a) Butane injection process:    On or prior to 3/1/18, the Process Hazard Analysis (Failure Modes and Effects Analysis) did not address the hazards of the process, including but not limited to:     -- Mechanical failure of liquid transfer pumps and related components, resulting in release of liquid butane with evaporation and possible ignition.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $6000
  • — Z (S) $9239

1910.119 F01 I E

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 7 exposed
Issued
Aug 23, 2018
Abate by
Feb 28, 2019
Penalty
Initial $9,239 · Current $6,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119 (f)(1)(i)(E) The employer did not develop and implement written operating procedures that provided clear instructions for safely conducting activities involved in each covered process consistent with the process safety information that addressed the steps for each operating phase, including emergency operations.    (a)  Butane injection process:   On or prior to 3/01/18, written operating procedures did not address emergency procedures, including, but not limited to:  loss of power or air pressure during railcar offloading.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $6000
  • — Z (S) $9239

1910.119 F01 II B

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Aug 23, 2018
Abate by
Sep 27, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.119(f)(1)(ii)(B): The employer did not develop and implement written operating procedures that provide clear instructions for steps required to correct or avoid deviation from the operating limits in the covered process.  (a)  Butane injection process:  On or prior to 3/01/18,  LPG Gasoline Tank Butane Injection Procedure(s) (line up procedure)did not address positions of hydrostatic expansion relief valve isolation valves to ensure they were in open position prior to operation of the process.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.119 J02

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 7 exposed
Issued
Aug 23, 2018
Penalty
Initial $7,853 · Current $6,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(2): The employer did not establish or implement written procedures to maintain the on-going integrity of process equipment:    (a) Butane injection process: On or prior to 3/1/2018, employees perform maintenance on butane transfer pumps including greasing the bearing assemblies and cleaning the inlet strainers.  The employer failed to establish written mechanical integrity procedures for these maintenance activities.      (b) Butane injection process: On or prior to 3/1/2018, employees perform maintenance on butane tanks including replacing the butane tank temperature probes.  The employer failed to establish written mechanical integrity procedures for this maintenance activity .
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $6000
  • — Z (S) $7853

1910.119 L01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Aug 23, 2018
Abate by
Jan 15, 2019
Penalty
Initial $9,239 · Current $6,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119(l)(1): The employer did not implement procedures to manage changes to process chemicals, technology, equipment, and procedures, and changes to facilities that affect a covered process    (a) Butane injection process:   On or prior to 3/1/18,  Management of change procedures were not implemented following 12/21/17 discovery of a leaking belly valve (valve 3-B) on Tank 3, which required monitoring of the leak, attempts to tighten the valve, and removal of tank 3 from service with transfer of contents to the remaining 11 tanks until the valve could be repaired on 3/13/18.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $6000
  • — Z (S) $9239

1910.132 A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Aug 23, 2018
Abate by
Feb 28, 2019
Penalty
Initial $7,391 · Current $6,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(a): Protective equipment was not used when necessary whenever hazards capable of causing injury and impairment were encountered:    (a)   At the facility:  On or prior to 3/1/18, use of FR (fire resistant) clothing was not required for use during job tasks where employees were exposed to potential flash fire hazards, including but not limited to:  Off Loading Butane Tanker Trucks, Off Loading Butane Rail Cars, Loading Butane Tanker Trucks, Butane Fitting Inspections, and Butane Blending Transfers
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $6000
  • — Z (S) $7391

1910.132 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 23, 2018
Abate by
Feb 28, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment:    (a)  Butane injection process:   On or prior to 3/1/18, the employer did not perform a hazard assessment to determine personal protective equipment needed for protection from flash fire and related hazards during maintenance job tasks, including but not limited to:  cleaning butane transfer pump inlet strainers, greasing butane transfer pump bearing assemblies, and replacing thermometer assembly on butane tanks.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.119 D03 I B

Other-than-serious 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Aug 23, 2018
Abate by
Feb 15, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i)(B): Information pertaining to equipment in the process did not include piping and instrumentation diagrams (P&IDs).     (a) Butane injection process:   On or prior to 3/1/18, P&IDs, including but not limited to 4163 P1R2, 4163 P2R3, and 4163 P4, did not accurately reflect installed pipes and equipment, in that the P&IDs contained errors including, but not limited to:    -Isolation valves (1/4 turn ball valves) for hydrostatic expansion relief valves were not indicated on drawings 4163-P1R1, 4163-P2R2, and 4163 R4     -2 inch relief line and associated components for P-1 as indicated on drawing 4163-P1-R1 was not installed     -Isolation valves 14-A, 14-B, and 14-C located on 6 inch liquid and 4 inch vapor lines were not indicated on drawing 4163-P1R1, 4163-P2R2, and 4163-R4    -Location of 4 inch SS flex lines upstream of inlet to butane transfer pumps were installed upstream of the Y strainer where drawing 4163-P1R1 and 4162-P2R3 indicated them installed on the downstream side.    -Bill of materials on drawing 4163-P1R1 consistently indicated different components than were actually installed, i.e Paget 4 inch inlet strainer where field verification found a Marshall Excelsion ME 24-100 was installed; P1 was indicated as a Blackmer 4 inch pump where a Corken Z4500 was installed, etc.    - Liquid butane line to truck rack upstream of 3 inch jumper valve was indicated as a 4 inch line where a 6 inch line was installed; 3 inch jumper valve (WOG 1000) was not indicated on drawing 4163-P1R1
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Cenex Rensselaer Terminal LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342989621.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.