Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MID-AMERICAN SALT, LLC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of MID-AMERICAN SALT, LLC in 20 SEAVIEW DRIVE, PROVIDENCE, RI 02905 (NAICS 424690). OSHA activity number 342991213.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Mid-American Salt, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Mid-American Salt, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
20 SEAVIEW DRIVE
City
PROVIDENCE
State
RI
ZIP
02905
Mailing
4528 HILLEGAS ROAD, FORT WAYNE, IN 46818
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
424690
Employees
23
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.178 A06

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 20, 2018
Abate by
Mar 29, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,696 · Current $2,587 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(a)(6): The employer did not ensure that all nameplates and markings were in place and were maintained in a legible condition:     (a) Worksite:  On or about 3/5/2018, the employer failed to maintain a forklift data plate in legible condition.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2587
  • — Z (S) $3696

1910.178 L06

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 20, 2018
Abate by
Mar 29, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(6): The employer did not certify that each operator has been trained and evaluated as required by this paragraph (l):   (a) Worksite:  On or about 3/5/2018, the employer did not ensure that employees were trained, evaluated and certified to operate forklifts.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 20, 2018
Abate by
Mar 29, 2018
Penalty
Initial $5,174 · Current $3,621 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:     (a) Worksite:  (1) On or about 3/5/2018, the employer did not ensure that ingoing nip points on the conveyor system were properly guarded where the conveyor belt meets the return drum and between the conveyor return drum and the non-powered metal rollers.      (2) On or about 3/5/2018, the employer did not ensure that the auger which pulls product from the trough below the mixing vat was guarded to prevent employees from making incidental contact, and from allowing employees to use their hands to pull samples of the mixed product from the trough area while the auger is turning.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3621
  • — Z (S) $5174

1910.219 E02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 20, 2018
Abate by
Mar 29, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.219(e)(2)(i): Overhead horizontal belt(s) with lower parts seven -7 feet or less from the floor(s) or platform(s) were not guarded on the sides and bottom in accordance with the requirements specified at CFR 1910.219(o)(3):  (a) Worksite:  On or about 3/5/2018, the employer did not ensure that the mixing vat motor drive belts, which were less than six feet from the floor level, were guarded.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1904.39 A02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 20, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,696 · Current $2,587 Reduced
29 CFR 1904.39(a)(2): The employer did not report the in-patient hospitalization of one or more employees to OSHA within twenty-four (24) hours:    (a) Worksite:  On or about 10/4/2017, the employer did not contact OSHA to report the in-patient hospitalization of an employee who sustained a serious hand injury within twenty-four hours.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $2587
  • — Z (O) $3696

1910.1200 H01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Mar 20, 2018
Abate by
May 3, 2018
Penalty
Initial $415 · Current $290 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:     (a) Worksite:  On or about 3/5/18, the employer had not provided effective training in chemical hazard communication to employees.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $290
  • — Z (O) $415

View Mid-American Salt, LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342991213.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.