Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: SOUTHERN FOODS GROUP LLC

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of SOUTHERN FOODS GROUP LLC in 1325 W. OXFORD, ENGLEWOOD, CO 80110 (NAICS 311511). OSHA activity number 343003323.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Southern Foods Group LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Southern Foods Group LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1325 W. OXFORD
City
ENGLEWOOD
State
CO
ZIP
80110
Mailing
1325 W. OXFORD, ENGLEWOOD, CO 80110
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
A
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
311511
Employees
130
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.119 D03 II

Other-than-serious 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 30, 2018
Abate by
Aug 30, 2018
Penalty
Initial $7,853 · Current $6,282 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer did not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices:    a) On or about March 6, 2018, and at prior times, the V-11 Pumper Drum Transfer vessel was operated at temperatures lower than its ASME stamped minimum design metal temperature.  The employer had not documented that the V-11 Pumper Drum Transfer vessel complied with RAGAGEP, such as ASME Section VIII Div 1 UG-20 or the National Board of Boiler and Pressure Vessel Inspectors- National Board Inspection Code.      b) On or about March 7, 2018, and at prior times, the V-27 Surge Drum was operated at temperatures lower than its ASME stamped minimum design metal temperature.  The employer had not documented that the V-27 Surge Drum complied with RAGEGEP, such as ASME Section VIII Div 1 UG-20 or the National Board of Boiler and Pressure Vessel Inspectors- National Board Inspection Code.    c) On or about March 6, 2018, and at prior times, the employer did not remove from service an ammonia transfer hose in the main engine room with a manufacturer recommended removal date of 2015.  The hose had been in service since 2009.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $6282
  • — Z (S) $7853

1910.119 D02 I D

Other-than-serious 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 30, 2018
Abate by
Aug 30, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(2)(i)(D): Information concerning the technology of the process did not include safe upper and lower limits for such items as temperatures, pressures, flows or compositions:      a) On or about March 6, 2018, and at prior times, the employer's written process safety information listed incorrect minimum design metal temperatures for the V-25, V-26, and V-27 Surge Drums.      b) On or about March 6, 2018, and at prior times, the employer's process safety information pertaining to the V-16 Oil Pot did not include safe upper pressure limits.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.119 D03 I B

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 30, 2018
Abate by
Aug 16, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i)(B): The employer's piping and instrument diagrams were not accurate and did not represent equipment that was existing and was part of the process:    a)  On or about March 6, 2018 and at times prior, the P&ID #ENGW 31 showing the V-27 Surge Drum was mislabeled and should have shown the V-26 Surge Drum.      b)  On or about March 6, 2018 and at times prior, the P&ID #ENGW 32 showing the V-26 Surge Drum was mislabeled and should have shown the V-27 Surge Drum.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.119 J04 III

Other-than-serious 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 30, 2018
Abate by
Aug 23, 2018
Penalty
Initial $7,853 · Current $6,282 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(4)(iii): The frequency of inspections and tests of process equipment was not consistent with applicable manufacturers' recommendations and good engineering practices, and more frequently if determined to be necessary by prior operating experience:      a) On or about March 6, 2018, and at prior times, ammonia detectors in the machinery room were not function tested on 3 month intervals between calibrations, per the manufacturer's recommendations and RAGAGEP such as IIAR 2-1999.        b) On or about March 6, 2018, and at prior times, calibration of ammonia detectors in the machinery room was not performed on a 6 month interval, per the manufacturer's recommendations and RAGAGEP such as IIAR 2-1999.       c)  On or about March 6, 2018, and at prior times, the safety relief valves on the V-1 high pressure receiver and the V-2 pilot receiver were not replaced on a 5-year interval, per the manufacturer's recommendations and RAGAGEP such as IIAR 110.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $6282
  • — Z (S) $7853

1910.119 J05

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 30, 2018
Abate by
Aug 23, 2018
Penalty
Initial $7,853 · Current $6,282 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer did not correct deficiencies in equipment that were outside acceptable limits (defined by the process safety information on paragraph (d) of this section) before use:      a) On or about March 6, 2018, and at prior times, the employer had not corrected deficiencies in equipment that was outside of acceptable limits as defined in paragraph (d)(3)(ii) of this section.  Damaged pipe insulation located above the shop mezzanine was noted on the employers 2016 mechanical integrity inspection.  The employer did not ensure that the insulation was repaired as specified in RAGAGEP such as IIAR 110.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $6282
  • — Z (S) $7853

1910.38 C02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 130 exposed
Issued
Jul 30, 2018
Abate by
Aug 16, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.38(c)(2): Procedures for emergency evacuation, including type of evacuation and exit route assignments, were not included in an Emergency Action Plan:  a) On March 6, 2018, and at prior times, the employer did not ensure correct procedures for emergency evacuation in case of ammonia release were included in the emergency action plan.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.147 C04 II C

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 30, 2018
Abate by
Aug 16, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii)(C): The energy control procedure did not clearly and specifically outline the steps for placement, removal and transfer of lockout devices or tagout devices and the responsibility for them.  a)  On or about March 6, 2018, and at times prior, the employer did not ensure that the energy control procedure in use for the HS-8 compound compressor contained steps to isolate and lockout valves, including, but not limited to, the AM-121 gate valve located in the main engine room.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Southern Foods Group LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343003323.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.