Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: CELESTINO PEREZ-PONCE

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of CELESTINO PEREZ-PONCE in LOT 11 THE OAKS AT MILL POND, MARIETTA, GA 30066 (NAICS 238170). OSHA activity number 343011995.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Celestino Perez-Ponce — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Celestino Perez-Ponce is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
LOT 11 THE OAKS AT MILL POND
City
MARIETTA
State
GA
ZIP
30066
Mailing
588 EDGEMOOR LN, JONESBORO, GA 30236
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238170
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

1 citation on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 8, 2018
Abate by
Aug 14, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,772 · Current $1,109 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): "Residential construction." Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure. Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502. Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems. Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems.  (a) New residential construction located on Lot 11, Roof: On or about 02/22/2018, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to fall hazards of 16 feet 2 inches to a lower level in that a fall protection system was not provided or used.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1108.8
  • — Z (S) $2772

View Celestino Perez-Ponce's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343011995.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.