GRAPEVINE, TX —
OSHA Inspection: THE FISHEL COMPANY
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of THE FISHEL COMPANY in 1227 LEGUNA VISTA WAY, GRAPEVINE, TX 76051 (NAICS 237110). OSHA activity number 343015327.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- THE FISHEL COMPANY
- Site address
- 1227 LEGUNA VISTA WAY
- City
- GRAPEVINE
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 76051
- Mailing
- 1366 DUBLIN ROAD, COLUMBUS, OH 43215
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 237110
- Employees
- 50
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.960 B01 I
- Issued
- May 4, 2018
- Abate by
- Jun 4, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $5,174 · Current $5,174
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 126.960(b)(1)(i): Employees not qualified worked on or with exposed energized lines or parts of equipment. Employee was not trained or certified to terminate the equipment exposing him to electrical hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $5174
- — Z (S) $5174
1910.269 L03 III
- Issued
- May 4, 2018
- Abate by
- Jun 4, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $3,880 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.269(l)(3)(iii): The employer did not ensure that no employee approached or took any conductive object closer to exposed energized parts than the employer's established minimum approach distance, unless provisions described in (l) (3) (iii) (A) - (C) were followed: On or about February 6, 2018, an employee working within the minimum approach distant while working on a transformer removed his rubber gloves to talk on a cell phone. The employee was exposed to electrical flash burns.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $3880
1910.269 L04 II B
- Issued
- May 4, 2018
- Abate by
- Jun 4, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $5,174 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.269(l)(4)(ii)(B): When an employee uses rubber insulating gloves or rubber insulating gloves and sleeves as insulation from energized parts (under paragraph (l)(3)(iii)(A) of this section), the employer shall ensure that the employee does not remove the rubber insulating gloves and sleeves until he or she is in a position where he or she cannot reach into the minimum approach distance, established by the employer under paragraph (l)(3)(i) of this section. On or about February 6, 2018, an employee was exposed to electrical flash burns without wearing rubber insulating gloves at all times in the Minimum Approach Distant.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $5174
1910.269 M02 I
- Issued
- May 4, 2018
- Abate by
- Jun 4, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $3,880 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.269(m)(2)(i): The employee that the employer designates pursuant to paragraph (m)(2) of this section as being in charge of the clearance shall make a request of the system operator to deenergize the particular section of line or equipment. The designated employee becomes the employee in charge (as this term is used in paragraph (m)(3) of this section) and is responsible for the clearance. The employer did not ensure the designated employee call to ensure the equipment was de-energize to permit ready and safe operation and maintenance exposing employees to flash burns.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $3880
1910.269 M03 II
- Issued
- May 4, 2018
- Abate by
- Jun 4, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $9,054 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.269(m)(3)(ii): The employer did not ensure that all switches, disconnectors, jumpers, taps, and other means through which known sources of electric energy may be supplied to the particular lines and equipment to be denenergized were open. The employer did not render such means inoperable, unless its design does not so permit, and then sure that such means are tagged to indicate that employees are at work: On or about February 6, 2018, the employer did not ensure employees, de-energize equipment, exposing them to electrical flash burns.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $9054
More inspections at The Fishel Company
View The Fishel Company's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 237110)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343015327.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.