Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MOULTON ENTERPRISES, INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of MOULTON ENTERPRISES, INC. in 120 RALCO WAY, CUMBERLAND, RI 02864 (NAICS 441310). OSHA activity number 343037040.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Moulton Enterprises, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Moulton Enterprises, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
120 RALCO WAY
City
CUMBERLAND
State
RI
ZIP
02864
Mailing
120 RALCO WAY, CUMBERLAND, RI 02864
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
441310
Employees
10
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 7 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Jul 27, 2018
Abate by
Sep 12, 2018
Penalty
Initial $311 · Current $311
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated: As of July 27, 2018, the employer had not certified to OSHA that the abatement was completed for the violations from Inspection 1303704, issued on 5-7-18, with a final order date of 6-4-18.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $311

1910.28 B03 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
May 7, 2018
Abate by
Jun 7, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,049 · Current $3,049
29 CFR 1910.28(b)(3)(iii): Each employee was not protected from falling into a stairway floor hole by a fixed guardrail system on all exposed sides, except at the stairway entrance:   Facility: On 03/23/2018, a stairway, allowing access to a lower level of the building, was open-sided on three sides.  Employees using adjacent storage racks would be exposed to falls in excess of nine (9) feet onto the stairway and the lower level of the building.
Recent events (3)
  • — I $11366
  • — Z $37888
  • — Z (S) $3049

1910.28 B11 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
May 7, 2018
Abate by
Jun 7, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.28(b)(11)(ii): Each flight of stairs having at least 3 treads and at least 4 risers was not equipped with stair rail systems and handrails in accordance with Table D-2, Stairway Handrail Requirements:  Facility: A stairway leading to the lower level of the building, having more then 3 treads and 4 risers, was not equipped with handrails on both sides of the stairway in accordance with Table D-2, Stairway Handrail Requirements.
Recent events (3)
  • — I $0
  • — Z $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
May 7, 2018
Abate by
Jun 21, 2018
Penalty
Initial $1,829 · Current $1,829
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii):   Facility: When employees used, and were exposed to, hazardous chemicals the employer did not develop and implement a written hazard communication program with those requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (ii).  These chemicals include, but are not limited to, solvent-based lubricants, used motor oils and coolants, and solvent-based spray paints.
Recent events (3)
  • — I $3751
  • — Z $22732
  • — Z (S) $1829

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
May 7, 2018
Abate by
Jun 21, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  Facility: Employees who used, and were exposed to, hazardous chemicals while conducting Jeep parts recycling activities did not receive effective training and information on hazardous chemicals used in their workplace.  The hazardous chemicals used include, but are not limited to, solvent-based lubricants, paints, used motor oils, engine coolants, and transmission fluids.
Recent events (3)
  • — I $0
  • — Z $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
May 7, 2018
Abate by
Jun 7, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify, through a written certification, that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed:  Facility:  When employees were required to use personal protective equipment during automobile recycling activities, the employer did not verify, through written certification, that a hazard assessment had been performed.
Recent events (3)
  • — I $212
  • — Z $4000
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.157 E02

Other-than-serious 2 instances 10 exposed
Issued
May 7, 2018
Abate by
May 23, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.157(e)(2): Portable fire extinguishers were not visually inspected at least monthly:  Facility: The employer did not ensure that all portable fire extinguishers in the facility had been visually inspected at least monthly: 1) Adjacent to the front of the facility: A fire extinguisher, set out for employee use, had not received a monthly, or annual inspection since 1981; 2) Next to the Computer Area: A fire extinguisher had not received a monthly inspection since 2015.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.157 E03

Other-than-serious 2 instances 20 exposed
Issued
May 7, 2018
Abate by
May 23, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.157(e)(3): Portable fire extinguishers were not subjected to an annual maintenance check:  Facility: In at least two instances the employer did not ensure that fire extinguishers, available for employee use in an emergency, had not received an annual maintenance check.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

View Moulton Enterprises, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343037040.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.