PITTSBURGH, PA —
OSHA Inspection: JOSE GARCIA
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of JOSE GARCIA in 641 GUENEVERE DRIVE, PITTSBURGH, PA 15237 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 343070553.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- JOSE GARCIA
- Site address
- 641 GUENEVERE DRIVE
- City
- PITTSBURGH
- State
- PA
- ZIP
- 15237
- Mailing
- 20734 ROUTE 19 LOT # 6, CRANBERRY TOWNSHIP, PA 16066
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 9
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Apr 17, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,217 · Current $2,217
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation: Job site, 641 Guenevere Drive, Pittsburgh, PA: On or about April 6, 2018, during roofing activities, the employer did not ensure that appropriate eye/face protection was used while operating nail guns.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2217
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Apr 17, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,772 · Current $2,772
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure: Job site, 641 Guenevere Drive, Pittsburgh, PA: On or about April 6, 2018, during roofing activities, the employer did not ensure that appropriate fall protection systems/devices were used where fall hazards of at least approximately 20 feet existed.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2772
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Apr 17, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,772 · Current $2,772
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): When portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder was used to gain access; or, when such an extension was not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder was not secured at its top to a rigid support that would not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, was not provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder: Job site, 641 Guenevere Drive, Pittsburgh, PA: On or about April 6, 2018, during roofing activities, the employer did not ensure that the ladder, used to gain access to/from the roof was properly extended, exposing employees to fall hazards of up to approximately 20 feet.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2772
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- Apr 17, 2018
- Abate by
- Apr 27, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not insure that programs existed that provided for the frequent and regular inspections of the job sites, materials, and equipment to be made by competent persons designated by the employers: Job site, 641 Guenevere Drive, Pittsburgh, PA: On or about April 6, 2018, during roofing activities, the employer did not ensure that proper safety protocols were being followed at the job site. Deficiencies noted during the inspection included, but were not limited to, failing to use appropriate fall protection at all times while working on the roof, not ensuring that ladders were properly extended beyond the roofline and permitting employees who operated nail guns to do so without using eye/face protection.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Jose Garcia
View Jose Garcia's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in PA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343070553.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.