Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: BMK ENTERPRISES, LLC

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of BMK ENTERPRISES, LLC in 3117 MENDOTA CT., OCONOMOWOC, WI 53066 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 343074753.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch BMK Enterprises, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for BMK Enterprises, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
3117 MENDOTA CT.
City
OCONOMOWOC
State
WI
ZIP
53066
Mailing
N4950 BUTTERNUT TRAIL, JUNEAU, WI 53039
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
2
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 15, 2018
Abate by
Aug 27, 2018
Penalty
Initial $311 · Current $311
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required.  (a)  The employer failed to provide documentation to the Agency demonstrating that abatement is completed for the serious violations that were issued by the Agency.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $311

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 8, 2018
Abate by
Jun 4, 2018
Penalty
Initial $1,663 · Current $1,663
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain a safety program which provides for frequent and regular inspections of jobsites, materials, and equipment to be made by a competent person:  (a) The employer did not ensure that a program was maintained that required frequent and regular inspections of the worksite for safety elements such as, but not limited to, fall hazards, electrical hazards, caught-in-between hazards and struck-by hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1663

1910.178 L01 II

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 8, 2018
Abate by
Jun 4, 2018
Penalty
Initial $1,663 · Current $1,663
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training required by paragraph (l), except as permitted by paragraph (l)(5), prior to permitting an employee to operate a telehandler forklift.  (a) The employer did not ensure that employees who operate the telehandler forklift received training in the safe operation of forklifts.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1663

1926.451 C02 V

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 8, 2018
Abate by
May 14, 2018
Penalty
Initial $1,663 · Current $1,663
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2)(v): The employer used forklifts  to support scaffold platforms without ensuring that the entire platform was attached to the fork and that the forklift was not moved horizontally while the platform was occupied:  (a) The employer did not ensure that a platform resting on the forks of a telehandler forklift was secured.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1663

1926.501 B13

Repeat Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 8, 2018
Abate by
May 14, 2018
Penalty
Initial $4,435 · Current $4,435
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):  (a) The employer did not ensure that employees were using fall protection when conducting framing carpentry work on a residential building.  BMK Enterprises, LLC was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13) which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1258047, citation number 01, item number 02 and was affirmed as a final order on September 27, 2017 with respect to a workplace location at 1712 Moccasin Trail, Waukesha, WI 53189.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (R) $4435

1926.451 G01

Repeat Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 8, 2018
Abate by
May 14, 2018
Penalty
Initial $4,435 · Current $4,435
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Employees on scaffolds more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level by fall protection established in paragraphs (g)(1)(i)-(vii) of this section:  (a) The employer did not ensure that employees were using fall protection when working from an elevated platform that was resting on the forks of a telehandler forklift.  BMK Enterprises, LLC was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1) which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1258047, citation number 01, item number 01 and was affirmed as a final order on September 27, 2017 with respect to a workplace location at 1712 Moccasin Trail, Waukesha, WI 53189.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (R) $4435

1926.503 A01

Repeat Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 8, 2018
Abate by
Jun 4, 2018
Penalty
Initial $4,435 · Current $4,435
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  (a) The employer did not ensure that employees received training in recognizing fall hazards and implementing fall protection for employees who conduct framing carpentry work on a residential building.  BMK Enterprises, LLC was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1926.503 (a)(1) which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1258047, citation number 01, item number 03 and was affirmed as a final order on September 27, 2017 with respect to a workplace location at 1712 Moccasin Trail, Waukesha, WI 53189.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (R) $4435

View BMK Enterprises, LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343074753.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.