PONTE VEDRA, FL —
OSHA Inspection: SUMMIT CONTRACTING GROUP, INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of SUMMIT CONTRACTING GROUP, INC. in 435 HUNTER LAKE WAY, PONTE VEDRA, FL 32081 (NAICS 236116). OSHA activity number 343104436.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SUMMIT CONTRACTING GROUP, INC.
- Site address
- 435 HUNTER LAKE WAY
- City
- PONTE VEDRA
- State
- FL
- ZIP
- 32081
- Mailing
- 1000 RIVERSIDE DRIVE, JACKSONVILLE, FL 32256
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 236116
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
1 citation on file for this inspection.
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Sep 12, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $11,640 · Current $11,640
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): a) On or about April 17, 2018: On a 6:12 pitch roof seven Martin Serrano Remodeling LLC employees were observed moving and installing roof trusses and were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor was employee provided with an alternative fall protection measure, the employees moving the roof trusses were exposed to a 34-feet fall hazard and the employees installing the roof trusses were exposed to a 15-feet fall hazard. b) On or about April 16, 2018: On a 6:12 pitch roof an Elite Construction & Associates LLC employee was observed installing fascia's and was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor was employee provided with an alternative fall protection measure, the employee was exposed to a 34-feet fall hazard. c) On or about April 17, 2018: An Elite Construction & Associates LLC employee was observed installing bracing elements to roof trusses was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor was employee provided with an alternative fall protection measure, the employee was exposed to a 34-feet fall hazard. d) On or about April 17, 2018: On a 6:12 pitch roof an Elite Construction & Associates LLC employee was observed installing roof sheathing and was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor was employee provided with an alternative fall protection measure, the employee was exposed to a 34-feet fall hazard. e) On or about April 17, 2018: On a 6:12 pitch roof an Elite Construction & Associates LLC employee was observed cutting wood and was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor was employee provided with an alternative fall protection measure, the employee was exposed to a 34-feet fall hazard. f) On or about April 17, 2018: An Elite Construction & Associates LLC employees was observed installing bracing elements and was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor was employee provided with an alternative fall protection measure, the employee was exposed to a 12-feet fall hazard. g) On or about April 17, 2018: On a 6:12 pitch roof a Superior Framing LMT LLC employees was observed cutting wood and the employee was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor was employee provided with an alternative fall protection measure, the employee was exposed to a 13-feet fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — C (S) $11640
- — Z (S) $11640
More inspections at Summit Contracting Group, INC.
View Summit Contracting Group, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 236116)
More inspections in FL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343104436.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.