CRANSTON, RI —
OSHA Inspection: EMI INDUSTRIES, LLC
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of EMI INDUSTRIES, LLC in 1485 ELMWOOD AVENUE, CRANSTON, RI 02910 (NAICS 337127). OSHA activity number 343144945.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- EMI INDUSTRIES, LLC
- Site address
- 1485 ELMWOOD AVENUE
- City
- CRANSTON
- State
- RI
- ZIP
- 02910
- Mailing
- 1485 ELMWOOD AVENUE, CRANSTON, RI 02910
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 337127
- Employees
- 85
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
11 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.22 A01
- Issued
- May 21, 2018
- Abate by
- Jul 6, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $6,467 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.22(a)(1): All places of employment, passageways, storerooms, service rooms and walking-working surfaces were not kept clean, orderly and in sanitary condition: (a) Worksite - Woodworking Shop: On or about 5/8/2018, the woodworking shop area, where wood boards are machine sanded, cut and drilled, had explosive wood dust build-up on the floor, the walls, overhead pipes, duct work, light fixtures and other surrounding surfaces.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $6467
1910.133 A01
- Issued
- May 21, 2018
- Abate by
- May 31, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $5,174 · Current $3,621 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation: (a) Worksite: On or about 5/8/2018, the employer did not ensure that employees wore personal protective equipment such as safety glasses for sanding or de-burring activities.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $3621
- — Z (S) $5174
1910.147 C04 II
- Issued
- May 21, 2018
- Abate by
- Jul 6, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $3,880 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii): The energy control procedures did not clearly and specifically outline the scope, purpose, authorization, rules, and techniques to be utilized for the control of hazardous energy, including, but not limited to Items of this section: (a) Worksite: On or about 5/8/2018, the employer did not develop machine specific Lockout/Tag-out procedures for isolating energy sources.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $3880
1910.147 C07 I A
- Issued
- May 21, 2018
- Abate by
- Jul 6, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $2,716
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i)(A): Authorized employee(s) did not receive training in the recognition of applicable hazardous energy sources, the type and magnitude of the energy available in the workplace, and the methods and means necessary for energy isolation: (a) Worksite: On or about 5/8/2018, the employer did not ensure that employees authorized to perform Lockout/Tag-out were trained to do so.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2716
- — Z (S) $0
1910.147 C07 I B
- Issued
- May 21, 2018
- Abate by
- Jul 6, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i)(B): Affected employees were not instructed in the purpose and use of the energy control procedure: (a) Worksite: On or about 5/8/2018, employees such as machine operators were not trained in the purpose and general procedure for controlling machine energy sources using Lockout/Tag-out.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.179 J02
- Issued
- May 21, 2018
- Abate by
- Jun 7, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $5,174 · Current $3,621 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.179(j)(2): Frequent inspections of the cranes were not performed at intervals as generally defined in paragraph (j)(1)(ii)(a) of this section or as specifically indicated: (a) Worksite - Metal Shop: On or about 5/8/2018, the employer did not ensure that cranes were inspected on a daily basis, or at a regular frequency other then annual, where it could be determined that the crane is not exposed to excessive wear, deterioration, or malfunction.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3621
- — Z (S) $5174
1910.184 C01
- Issued
- May 21, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $5,174 · Current $3,621 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.184(c)(1): Sling(s) that were damaged or defective were used: (a) Worksite - Metal Shop: On or about 5/8/2018, the employer did not take damaged (worn and torn) web slings out of service.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $3621
- — Z (S) $5174
1910.184 C14
- Issued
- May 21, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.184(c)(14): The employer allowed for slings without affixed and legible identification markings to be used: (a) Worksite - Metal Shop: On or about 5/8/2018, the employer did not take web slings with missing or illegible data tags out of service.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- May 21, 2018
- Abate by
- Dec 31, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $9,054 · Current $6,337 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks: (a) Worksite - Metal Shop: (1) On or about 5/8/2018, the employer did not ensure that employees were protected from point of operation hazards while operating the #2 Press Brake (Amada Promecam). (2) On or about 5/8/2018, the employer did not ensure that employees were protected from ingoing nip points while operating the Kalamazoo sander.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $6337
- — Z (S) $9054
1910.178 L04
- Issued
- May 21, 2018
- Abate by
- Jul 6, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $726 · Current $508 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(4): An evaluation of each powered industrial truck operator's performance was not conducted at least once every 3 years: (a) Worksite: On or about 5/8/2018, the employer did not ensure that each forklift operator received a skills evaluation during initial training and again every three years.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $508
- — Z (O) $726
1910.303 G01
- Issued
- May 21, 2018
- Abate by
- May 31, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.303(g)(1): Sufficient access and working space was not provided and maintained about all electric equipment (operating at 600 volts, nominal, or less to ground) to permit ready and safe operation and maintenance of such equipment: (a) Worksite - Woodworking Shop: On or about 5/8/2018, the employer did not ensure that six main disconnect electrical switches had a clear working space in front of them for access and maintenance purposes.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at EMI Industries, LLC
View EMI Industries, LLC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 337127)
More inspections in RI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343144945.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.