Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: A1 POLYMER

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of A1 POLYMER in 3137 HILLCREST AVE, MACON, GA 31204 (NAICS 423930). OSHA activity number 343152666.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch A1 Polymer — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for A1 Polymer is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
A1 POLYMER
Site address
3137 HILLCREST AVE
City
MACON
State
GA
ZIP
31204
Mailing
3137 HILLCREST AVE, MACON, GA 31204
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
423930
Employees
9
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 22, 2018
Abate by
Sep 25, 2018
Penalty
Initial $1,663 · Current $1,164 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): The employer did ensure that an employee using a tight-fitting facepiece respirator was fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator, whenever a different respirator facepiece (size, style, model or make) was used, and at least annually thereafter:  a) Plant - On or about 05/10/18 and at times prior thereto employees were instructed to wear half face, tight fit, negative pressure respirators with dust cartridges, and the employer did not ensure that employees were fit-tested prior to the use of the respirator.  In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1164.1
  • — Z (S) $1663

1910.147 C04 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 22, 2018
Abate by
Sep 25, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,880 · Current $2,716 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii): Procedures did not clearly and specifically outline the scope, purpose, authorization, rules, and techniques to be utilized for the control of hazardous energy, and the means to enforce compliance including, but not limited to, 29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii)(A), (c)(4)(ii)(B), (c)(4)(ii)(C) and (c)(4)(ii)(D):  a) - On or about 05/10/18 and at times prior thereto employees performed maintenance and repairs of equipment including (but not limited to) the shaker, wash line components, air compressor, and additional machinery subjected to lockout/tagout  as described in the equipment inventory of date 05/10/18. The employer applied a single general lockout/tagout procedure, but did not develop and implement a specific written lockout/tagout procedure for each machine.  In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification. This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement, or other written records.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2716
  • — Z (S) $3880

1910.147 C07 I B

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 22, 2018
Abate by
Sep 25, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,772 · Current $1,940 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i)(B): Affected employees were not instructed in the purpose and use of the energy control procedure:  a) Plant - On or about 05/10/18 and at times prior thereto the employer conducted maintenance and repairs of plant machinery. Affected employees were not trained in relation to the control of hazardous energy and lockout/tagout.   In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1940.4
  • — Z (S) $2772

1910.178 Q06

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 22, 2018
Abate by
Sep 25, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,772 · Current $1,940 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(6): Powered industrial trucks were altered so that the relative positions of the various parts were different from what they were when originally received from the manufacturer, by the addition of extra parts not provided by the manufacturer, or by the elimination of any parts without the manufacturer's approval:  a) Plant - On or about 05/10/18 and at times prior thereto employees operated the orange color Toyota (LPG-powered) forklift.  The front rack was cut to lower its height. Roller chains and hydraulic hoses were exposed to damage caused by the displacement of the load on the forks.  In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification. This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement, or other written records.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1940.4
  • — Z (S) $2772

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 22, 2018
Abate by
Sep 25, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,880 · Current $2,716 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, and rotating parts:  a) Plant - On or about 05/10/18 and at times prior thereto employees operated the polymer baths. The paddled rollers were not guarded.     b) Plant - On or about 05/10/18 and at times prior thereto employees operated the polymer baths.  The screw conveyor (auger) was not guarded.      Or in the alternative: a) Plant - On or about 05/10/18 and at times prior thereto employees operated the polymer baths. The paddled rollers were not guarded.     b) Plant - On or about 05/10/18 and at times prior thereto employees operated the polymer baths.  The screw conveyor (auger) was not guarded.     In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification. This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement, or other written records.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2716
  • — Z (S) $3880

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 22, 2018
Abate by
Sep 25, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,217 · Current $1,552 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  a) Plant - On or about 05/10/18 and at times prior thereto employees came in contact with chemicals including (but not limited to) Red Rage detergent (sodium metasilicate), and compressed liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), oxygen, acetylene, and carbon dioxide. The employer did not train the employees in relation to the Hazard Communication Program, the safety data sheets (SDSs), and the "Right to Know".   In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(d), abatement certification is required for this violation (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET), and in addition, documentation demonstrating that abatement is complete must be included with your certification. This documentation may include, but is not limited to, evidence of the purchase or repair of the equipment, photographic or video evidence of abatement, or other written records.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1551.9
  • — Z (S) $2217

View A1 Polymer's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343152666.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.