Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: SIKA CORPORATION

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of SIKA CORPORATION in 4155 SCOFILED RD., DOUGLASVILLE, GA 30134 (NAICS 325510). OSHA activity number 343176046.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Sika Corporation — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Sika Corporation is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
SIKA CORPORATION
Site address
4155 SCOFILED RD.
City
DOUGLASVILLE
State
GA
ZIP
30134
Mailing
4155 SCOFILED RD., DOUGLASVILLE, GA 30134
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
325510
Employees
42
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 D02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 14, 2018
Abate by
Dec 11, 2018
Penalty
Initial $12,934 · Current $7,760 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(d)(2): The machine or equipment was not turned off or shut down using the energy control procedures established for the machine or equipment:    a) Production Area, Mill Room-  On or about May 22, 2018 and at times prior, the employer exposed a temporary employee to an amputation hazard, in that, the employer failed to ensure that the authorized employee followed the established machine specific energy control procedure for mill #4 which was posted on the wall behind the mill beside the disconnect. The employee who had to partially enter the mill to clean the inside, including the mixing apparatus, did not lockout the mill at the disconnect switch and did not turn off the machine. The emergency stop had been engaged.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $7760.4
  • — Z (S) $12934

1910.147 C07 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 14, 2018
Abate by
Dec 11, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i): The employer did not provide training to ensure that the purpose and function of the energy control program are understood by employees and that the knowledge and skills required for the safe application, usage, and removal of the energy controls are acquired by employees:  a) Production Area, Mill Room- On or about May 22, 2018, and at times prior, the employer exposed an employee to an amputation hazard, in that the employer failed to provide lockout/tagout training to the (temporary) authorized employee to ensure that the employee acquired the knowledge and skills required for the safe application, usage and removal of energy control devices when cleaning equipment such as, but not limited to the powder mixing mill #4.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 C07 IV

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 14, 2018
Abate by
Dec 11, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(iv): The employer did not certify that employee training had been accomplished:  a) Production Area, Mill Room- On or about May 22, 2018, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to an amputation hazard, in that the employer failed to maintain certified lockout/tagout training records for two (temporary) authorized employees required to lockout powder mixer mills and bagging machines during the cleaning process.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.146 C07 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 14, 2018
Abate by
Dec 11, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.146(c)(7)(i): A space classified by the employer as permit-required confined space was reclassified as a non-permit confined space when all hazards within the space were not eliminated without entry into the space:  (a) Production Area, Mill Room-  On or about May 22, 2018 and at times prior, the employer exposed an employee to an amputation hazard, in that, the employer failed to ensure that a temporary employee eliminated all hazards prior to entry by following the established machine specific lockout/tagout procedure for mill #4 which was the basis for reclassifying the mill from permit required to non-permit required.  The employee partially entered the mill to clean the inside, including the mixing apparatus and did not lockout the mill.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.146 G04

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 14, 2018
Abate by
Dec 11, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.146(g)(4): The employer did not certify that the training required by 29 CFR 1910.146(g)(1) through 29 CFR 1910.146(g)(3) had been accomplished:  a) Production Area, Mill Room- On or about May 22, 2018, and at times prior, the employer exposed an employee to an amputation hazard, in that the employer failed to provide permit required confined space training to a temporary employee to ensure that the employee acquired the knowledge and skills necessary for the safe entry into a reclassified permit required confined space. The employee partially entered mill #4 without eliminating all hazards prior to entry by following the established machine specific lockout/tagout procedures which was the basis for reclassifying the mill from permit required to non-permit required.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K06

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Nov 14, 2018
Abate by
Dec 11, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(6): The employer did not provide the basic advisory information on respirators, as presented in Appendix D of 29 CFR 1910.134, in written or oral format to employees who wear respirators when such use was not required by the employer:  (a) Production Area, Mill Room- Employees exposed to dust while mixing raw ingredients (powders) and bagging finished products to produce decorative concrete coloring, were wearing filtering face piece type respirators (disposable dust masks) and were not given the information regarding the use and limitations of dust masks contained in Appendix D of the respirator standard. The dust masks were used on a voluntary basis.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 H03 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 14, 2018
Abate by
Dec 11, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9010

29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(ii): Employee training did not include the physical and health hazards of the chemicals in the work area:  (a) Production area, Mill Room- On or about May 22, 2018, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to health hazards by not including the physical and health hazards of silica in the company's hazard communication training for temporary employees. Temporary employees mixed raw products and bagged finished products containing silica.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Sika Corporation's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343176046.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.