Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: OLD BRIDGE CHEMICALS, INC.

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of OLD BRIDGE CHEMICALS, INC. in 554 WATERWORKS ROAD, OLD BRIDGE, NJ 08857 (NAICS 325180). OSHA activity number 343204038.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch OLD Bridge Chemicals, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for OLD Bridge Chemicals, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
554 WATERWORKS ROAD
City
OLD BRIDGE
State
NJ
ZIP
08857
Mailing
554 WATERWORKS ROAD, OLD BRIDGE, NJ 08857
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
325180
Employees
130
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.132 D01 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Nov 29, 2018
Penalty
Initial $11,641 · Current $9,895 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1)(i): The employer did not select and have each affected employee use, the types of personal protective equipment that would protect the affected employee(s) from the hazards identified in the hazard assessment:    a) Old Bridge Chemical, Inc./Old Bridge, NJ -Throughout the Plant: The employer did not select and require employees to use the types of personal protective equipment that would protect the affected employee from the hazards present while performing their assigned duties. Employees working in the Copper and Zinc area are exposed to splashes with hot steam and acid. Employee working on and around Digester #7 and Digester #8 was splashed with hot copper sulfate solution and suffered burns.     Incident occurred on June 3, 2018.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $9895
  • — Z (S) $11641

1910.133 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Nov 29, 2018
Abate by
Dec 26, 2018
Penalty
Initial $11,641 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): Protective face equipment was not required where there was a reasonable probability of injury that could be prevented by such equipment:    a) Old Bridge Chemical, Inc./Old Bridge, NJ -Throughout the Plant: The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors. Employees such as but not limited to maintenance workers, equipment operators (digester), and helpers working in the Copper and Zinc area are wearing safety glasses which do not provide adequate protection. Exposing employees to:  - Flying particles/dust during shoveling and addition of copper.  - Sulfuric acid splashes during the addition process or during the maintenance operations.  - Hot liquid chemicals such as copper sulfate while digester is used and when copper is added, during sampling, and when unclogging process is conducted.     Condition noted on or about June 5, 2018.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $11641

1910.146 C02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Nov 29, 2018
Abate by
Dec 26, 2018
Penalty
Initial $11,641 · Current $9,895 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.146(c)(2): The employer did not inform exposed employees, by posting danger signs or by any other equally effective means, of the existence and location of and the danger posed by the permit spaces:    a) Old Bridge Chemical, Inc./Old Bridge, NJ -Throughout the Plant: The Employer did not post signs in order to inform employees of the existence, location, and the danger posed by the permit spaces present on site such as, but not limited to Zinc and Copper storage tanks, reactors, and digesters.    Condition noted on or about June 5, 2018.    NOTE: A sign reading DANGER-PERMIT-REQUIRED CONFINED SPACE, DO NOT ENTER or using other similar language would satisfy the requirement for a sign.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $9895
  • — Z (S) $11641

1910.146 D09

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Nov 29, 2018
Abate by
Dec 26, 2018
Penalty
Initial $11,641 · Current $9,895 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.146(d)(9): The employer did not develop and implement procedures for summoning rescue and emergency services, for rescuing entrants from permit spaces, for providing necessary emergency services to rescued employees:    a) Old Bridge Chemical, Inc./Old Bridge, NJ -Throughout the Plant: The Employer did not ensure that Confined Space Entry Program addresses rescue and emergency services to be summoned, the means for summoning those services, and procedures to be used to rescue the entrants from permit spaces. Employees were required to perform work and were authorized to enter permit required confined spaces such as but not limited to Zinc and Copper tanks and reactors.     Condition noted on or about June 5, 2018.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $9895
  • — Z (S) $11641

1910.146 F11

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Nov 29, 2018
Abate by
Dec 26, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.146(f)(11): The entry permit that documented compliance and authorized entry to a permit space did not identify the rescue and emergency services to be summoned and the means for summoning those services:  a) Old Bridge Chemical, Inc./Old Bridge, NJ -Throughout the Plant: The Employer did not ensure that the tank entry permit identified the rescue and emergency services to be summoned, and the means for summoning those services during the time of the work conducted in the permit required confined space. Employees were required to perform work and were authorized to enter permit required confined spaces such as but not limited to Zinc and Copper tanks and reactors.   Condition noted on or about June 5, 2018.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.146 G01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Nov 29, 2018
Abate by
Dec 26, 2018
Penalty
Initial $11,641 · Current $9,895 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.146(g)(1): The employer did not provide training so that all employees whose work was regulated by 29 CFR 1910.146 (permit required confined spaces) acquired the understanding, knowledge, and skills necessary for the safe performance of the duties assigned under 29 CFR 1910.146:    a) Old Bridge Chemical, Inc./Old Bridge, NJ -Throughout the Plant: The Employer did not ensure that all employees acquired the understanding, knowledge, and skills necessary for the safe performance of the duties assigned to them including but not limited to performing rescue, documenting measurements and providing necessary information on the permit. Employees were required to perform work and were authorized to enter permit required confined spaces such as but not limited to Zinc and Copper tanks and reactors.     Condition noted on or about June 5, 2018.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $9895
  • — Z (S) $11641

1910.147 C04 I

Repeat Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Nov 29, 2018
Abate by
Jan 18, 2019
Penalty
Initial $23,281 · Current $19,788 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section:    a) Old Bridge Chemical, Inc./Old Bridge, NJ -Throughout the Plant: The employer did not develop and implement machine specific energy control procedures where employees were required to perform servicing and maintenance on equipment used on site such as, but not limited to reactors and digesters. The employees were exposed to hazardous energy stored within the system, including: electrical, mechanical, chemical, and thermal.    Condition noted on or about June 5, 2018.    The Old Bridge Chemical, Inc., was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1249935, citation number 1, item number 1, and was affirmed as a final order on 12/14/2017, with respect to a workplace located at 554 Waterworks Road, Old Bridge, NJ 08857.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (R) $19788
  • — Z (R) $23281

View OLD Bridge Chemicals, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343204038.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.