Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: INCOBRASA INDUSTRIES, LTD

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of INCOBRASA INDUSTRIES, LTD in 540 E US HWY 24, GILMAN, IL 60938 (NAICS 311224). OSHA activity number 343228953.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Incobrasa Industries, LTD — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Incobrasa Industries, LTD is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
540 E US HWY 24
City
GILMAN
State
IL
ZIP
60938
Mailing
PO BOX 98, GILMAN, IL 60938
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
311224
Employees
153
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.28 B01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Oct 24, 2018
Abate by
Dec 17, 2018
Penalty
Initial $5,654 · Current $4,690 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.28(b)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each employee on a walking-working surface with an unprotected side or edge that was 4 feet (1.2 m) or more above a lower level was protected from falling by one or more of the following:  Guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems:      On or about June 13, 2018, employees conducting maintenance activities inside the cooling tower were exposed to fall hazards when stepping on the plywood platform on the intermediate layer of filter media and no guardrails or other fall protection was provided.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4690
  • — Z (S) $5654

1910.146 C01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Oct 24, 2018
Abate by
Nov 26, 2018
Penalty
Initial $5,654 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.146(c)(1): The employer did not evaluate the workplace to determine if any spaces were permit-required confined spaces:   On or about June 13, 2018, employees conducting maintenance activities entered the extraction cooling tower to remove, inspect and clean the nozzles and the employer had not adequately evaluated the space to determine it was a permit-required confined space.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $5654

1910.146 C02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Oct 24, 2018
Abate by
Nov 26, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $2,500
29 CFR 1910.146(c)(2): The employer did not inform exposed employees, by posting danger signs or by any other equally effective means, of the existence and location of and the danger posed by the permit spaces:    On or about June 13, 2018, employees conducting maintenance activities entered the extraction cooling tower to remove, inspect and clean the nozzles and the employer had not informed exposed employees, by posting danger signs or by any other equally effective means, of the existence and location of and the danger posed by the permit space.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2500
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 C04 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Oct 24, 2018
Abate by
Nov 26, 2018
Penalty
Initial $5,654 · Current $4,690 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii): The energy control procedures did not clearly and specifically outline the scope, purpose, authorization, rules, and techniques to be utilized for the control of hazardous energy, including, but not limited to Items of this sec:    On or about June 13, 2018, employees conducting maintenance activities entered the extraction cooling tower to remove, inspect and clean the nozzles. These activities required the control of hazardous energy of equipment such as fans and pumps and the employer had not developed an adequate energy control program that was specific to the work being done in the facility or the equipment being serviced or maintained in the facility.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4690
  • — Z (S) $5654

1910.147 C06 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Oct 24, 2018
Abate by
Nov 26, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i): The employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirement of this standard were being followed:   On or about June 13, 2018, employees conducting maintenance activities entered the extraction cooling tower to remove, inspect and clean the nozzles. These activities required the control of hazardous energy of equipment such as fans and pumps and an annual inspection of the energy control procedures had not been conducted by the employer.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 C06 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Oct 24, 2018
Abate by
Nov 26, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(ii): The employer did not certify that periodic inspections of the energy control procedures had been performed:  On or about June 13, 2018, employees conducting maintenance activities entered the extraction cooling tower to remove, inspect and clean the nozzles. These activities required the control of hazardous energy of equipment such as fans and pumps and the employer had not certified periodic inspections had been performed
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 C07 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Oct 24, 2018
Abate by
Nov 26, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i): The employer did not provide adequate training to ensure that employees acquired the knowledge and skills required for the safe application, usage and removal of energy control devices:  On or about June 13, 2018, employees conducting maintenance activities entered the extraction cooling tower to remove, inspect and clean the nozzles. These activities required the control of hazardous energy of equipment such as fans and pumps and the employer had not developed an adequate energy control program which included training to ensure the purpose and function of the program was understood by the employees.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 F03 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Oct 24, 2018
Abate by
Nov 26, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(f)(3)(ii): Group lockout or tagout devices were not used in accordance with procedures required by 29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4):  On or about June 13, 2018, employees conducting maintenance activities entered the extraction cooling tower to remove, inspect and clean the nozzles. These activities required the control of hazardous energy of equipment such as fans and pumps and the employer did not provide a procedure in which all employees exercised exclusive control over the energy isolating devices.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View Incobrasa Industries, LTD's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343228953.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.