Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: JR CONSTRUCTION

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of JR CONSTRUCTION in 696 AVON BELDEN ROAD, AVON LAKE, OH 44012 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 343253423.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch JR Construction — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for JR Construction is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
JR CONSTRUCTION
Site address
696 AVON BELDEN ROAD
City
AVON LAKE
State
OH
ZIP
44012
Mailing
4513 W. 136TH STREET, CLEVELAND, OH 44135
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 F06

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 12, 2018
Abate by
Jul 31, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,880 · Current $1,654 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(6): Scaffolds were erected, used, dismantled, altered, or moved such that they, or any conductive material handled on them, could have come closer than the minimum distances established for specific voltages as set forth in the table in subparagraph (f)(6):    On or about June 26, 2018, the employer failed to ensure that the scaffold erected in place and used by employees was kept the minimal distance from the infeed power line to the home as indicated in table in paragraph (f)(6) of this section. The ladder jack scaffold in use was identified as being only 24 inches from the uninsulated infeed line.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1654
  • — Z (S) $3880

1926.451 G01 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 12, 2018
Abate by
Jul 31, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,880 · Current $1,954 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(i): Each employee on a boatswains' chair, catenary scaffold, float scaffold, needle beam scaffold, or ladder jack scaffold was not protected by a personal fall arrest system:    On or about June 26, 2018, the employer failed to ensure that employees working from a ladder jack scaffold system were protected by the use of a personal fall arrest system (PFAS). Employees were working from the scaffold which was approximately 17 feet from the ground below.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1954
  • — Z (S) $3880

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 12, 2018
Abate by
Jul 31, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,880 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):    On or about June 26, 2018, the employer failed to ensure that employees were protected from falling from the roof while performing tear off activities. Personal fall arrest systems were available on-site, however employees were observed not utilizing them. The roof had a pitch of 11/12, and the fall height was approximately 20 feet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $3880

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 4 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 12, 2018
Abate by
Jul 31, 2018
Penalty
Initial $2,772 · Current $1,654 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:    On or about June 26, 2018, the employer failed to ensure that extension ladders used on site to gain access to the roof were extended at least 3 feet above the roof line. Four ladders were used to gain access to the roof and were not extended at least three feet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1654
  • — Z (S) $2772

1926.1053 B06

Serious Gravity 5 4 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 12, 2018
Abate by
Jul 31, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(6): Unsecured ladder(s) were used on surfaces that were not stable and level:  On or about June 26, 2018, the employer failed to ensure that extension ladders used on site to gain access to the roof were positioned on stable and level ground. Five ladders were on site and in use by employees and none of the five ladders were level.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.404 B01 III C

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 12, 2018
Abate by
Jul 31, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.404(b)(1)(iii)(C): The employer did not ensure that each cord set, attachment cap, plug and receptacle of cord sets, and any equipment connected by cord and plug, except cord sets and receptacles which are fixed and not exposed to damage, were visually inspected before each day's use for external defects, such as deformed or missing pins or insulation damage, and for indications of possible internal damage;  On or about June 26, 2018, the employer failed to visually inspect cords being used onsite prior to their use. An extension cord was being used to supply power to a handheld saw at the time of inspection. The cord contained visible damage.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1926.403 B02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 12, 2018
Abate by
Jul 31, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.403(b)(2): Listed, labeled, or certified equipment was not installed and used in accordance with instructions included in the listing, labeling, or certification:  On or about June 26, 2018, the employer failed to ensure that listed and labeled electrical equipment was being used in the correct manner as identified by the manufacturer. Flexible cords were connected to one another to create longer continuous length.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View JR Construction's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343253423.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.