LUBBOCK, TX —
OSHA Inspection: JOSE VALDEZ
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of JOSE VALDEZ in 13812 AVENUE U, LUBBOCK, TX 79424 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 343261434.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- JOSE VALDEZ
- Site address
- 13812 AVENUE U
- City
- LUBBOCK
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 79424
- Mailing
- 13812 AVENUE U, LUBBOCK, TX 79424
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Oct 15, 2018
- Abate by
- Nov 8, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,439 · Current $2,439
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical agents. On or about June 28, 2018, employees engaged in roofing operations while operating nail guns without eye protection.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2439
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Oct 15, 2018
- Abate by
- Nov 8, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $3,880 · Current $3,880
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b). On or about June 28, 2018, employer did not ensure employees engaged in roofing operations in excess of six fee were provided fall protection.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3880
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Oct 15, 2018
- Abate by
- Nov 8, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: On or about June 28, 2018, employees had not been trained to recognize hazards related to falls and the procedures to follow that would minimize those hazards while performing roofing activities, at a height of over 6 feet, without fall protection.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Oct 15, 2018
- Abate by
- Nov 8, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,439 · Current $2,439
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: On or about June 28, 2018, employees engaged in roofing work were exposed to fall hazards while using a ladder that did not extend at least three feet above the roof's landing.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2439
1926.1053 B06
- Issued
- Oct 15, 2018
- Abate by
- Nov 8, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(6): Ladders were not used only on stable and level surfaces unless secured to prevent accidental displacement: On or about June 28, 2018, the employer did not ensure ladders used to gain access to the roof were secured.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B20
- Issued
- Oct 15, 2018
- Abate by
- Nov 8, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,439 · Current $2,439
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(20): Employees were not facing the ladder when ascending or descending the ladder: On or about June 28, 2018, the employer did not ensure employees were facing the ladder while descending the ladder.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2439
1926.1060 A
- Issued
- Oct 15, 2018
- Abate by
- Nov 8, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways and train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards. An employee performing electrical work from ladders had not been trained to recognize hazards related to ladders and the procedures to follow that would minimize the hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at Jose Valdez
View Jose Valdez's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343261434.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.