Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: FRESH MARK INC.

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of FRESH MARK INC. in 1888 SOUTHWAY ST. S.W., MASSILLON, OH 44646 (NAICS 311612). OSHA activity number 343271128.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Fresh Mark INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Fresh Mark INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
FRESH MARK INC.
Site address
1888 SOUTHWAY ST. S.W.
City
MASSILLON
State
OH
ZIP
44646
Mailing
P.O. BOX 571, MASSILLON, OH 44648
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
A
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
311612
Employees
850
Ownership type
A

1 citation on file for this inspection.

1910.147 D

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Oct 3, 2018
Abate by
Oct 24, 2018
Penalty
Initial $12,934 · Current $11,374 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(d): The established procedure for the application of energy control (the lockout or tagout procedures) was not done in sequence as required by 29 CFR 1910.147(d)(1)-(6):     On or about July 2, 2018, employees were exposed to machine hazards associated with moving parts, in-going nip points, and thermal hazards during a maintenance servicing task. The #2 multi-vac raw bacon slicing and packaging machine at line 16 had a jam of film packaging material at the heat sealing die box. The employer failed to implement energy control application steps as LOTO devices were not applied to the electrical disconnect and the pneumatic valve [per the 1910.147(d)(4) requirements]. Employees were using small magnets (part 5463101003) placed on reed switch dual channel interlocking safety devices (part #103778984) to override and bypass the safety devices during the servicing task. As a result, the remaining applicable energy control elements, involving dissipation of residual energy [(d)(5)(i)], and verification of isolation [(d)(6)], were not implemented to protect employees from servicing hazards.     prepare for shutdown [(d)(1)]; - Ensure authorized employee has knowledge of the type, magnitude, the hazard, and the method or means to control the energy;    shutdown the machine or equipment [(d)(2)];    machine isolation [(d)(3)]; Physically locate and operate all energy isolating devices that are needed to control the energy to the machine or equipment in such a manner as to isolate the machine or equipment from the energy source(s);    LOTO device application [(d)(4)]; Affix a lockout or tagout device to each energy isolating device;    dissipation of residual energy [(d)(5)(i)]; relieve, disconnect, restrain, and otherwise render safe all potentially hazardous stored or residual energy;    verification of isolation [(d)(6)]; verify that isolation and deenergization of the machine or equipment has been accomplished;
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $11374
  • — C (S) $12934
  • — Z (S) $12934

View Fresh Mark INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343271128.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.