Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: SUPERIOR MASONRY, INC.

Unprogrammed Other inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Other safety inspection of SUPERIOR MASONRY, INC. in 1753 SPRINGHILL AVENUE, MOBILE, AL 36607 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 343287488.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Superior Masonry, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Superior Masonry, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1753 SPRINGHILL AVENUE
City
MOBILE
State
AL
ZIP
36607
Mailing
3401 BELTLINE PARK DRIVE N, MOBILE, AL 36617
Inspection type
Unprogrammed Other (I)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
25
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 B05 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Dec 26, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,696 · Current $2,220 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(5)(ii): The end of a platform greater than 10 feet in length extended over its support more than 18 inches and the platform was not designed and installed so that the cantilevered portion of the platform is able to support employees without tipping, or has guardrails which block employee access to the cantilivered end:  a) Northern fabricated scaffolding system located on the east wall: On or about July 9, 2018, the employer did not ensure the platform ends which were used to transition between the ladder and 2nd platform level did not extend greater than 18-inches over the support which exposed employees to injuries associated with falls of 14-feet to the ground below.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2220
  • — Z (S) $3696

1926.451 F03

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Dec 26, 2018
Abate by
Jan 15, 2019
Penalty
Initial $3,696 · Current $2,220 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(3): Scaffolds and scaffold components were not inspected for visible defects by a competent person before each work shift, and after any occurrence which could affect a scaffold's structural integrity:    a) Southern fabricated scaffolding system located on the east wall: On or about July 1, 2018, the employer did not ensure a competent person inspected the scaffolding system prior to use which exposed employees to injuries associated with falls up to 17-feet to the ground below.    b) Middle fabricated scaffolding system located on the east wall: On or about July 9, 2018, the employer did not ensure a competent person inspected the scaffolding system prior to use which exposed employees to injuries associated with falls up to 14-feet to the ground below  c) Northern fabricated scaffolding system located on the east wall: On or about July 1, 2018, the employer did not ensure a competent person inspected the scaffolding system prior to use which exposed employees to injuries associated with falls of 14-feet to the ground below.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2220
  • — Z (S) $3696

1926.451 G01 VII

Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Dec 26, 2018
Abate by
Jan 15, 2019
Penalty
Initial $5,174 · Current $3,100 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): For all scaffolds not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, each employee shall be protected by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section:  a) Southern fabricated scaffolding system located on the east wall: On or about July 9, 2018, the employer did not ensure guardrail systems or another equivalent method of fall protection was used when there were unprotected sides which exposed employees to injuries associated with falls up to 17-feet to the ground below.  b) Middle fabricated scaffolding system located on the east wall: On or about July 9, 2018, the employer did not ensure guardrail systems or another equivalent method of fall protection was used when there were unprotected sides which exposed employees to injuries associated with falls up to 17-feet to the ground below.  c) Northern fabricated scaffolding system located on the east wall: On or about July 9, 2018, the employer did not ensure guardrail systems or another equivalent method of fall protection was used when there were unprotected sides which exposed employees to injuries associated with falls of 14-feet to the ground below.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3100
  • — Z (S) $5174

View Superior Masonry, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343287488.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.