BERLIN, NH —
OSHA Inspection: DEFLEX INNOVATIONS INC.
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of DEFLEX INNOVATIONS INC. in 22 JERICHO ROAD, BERLIN, NH 03570 (NAICS 336211). OSHA activity number 343319695.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- DEFLEX INNOVATIONS INC.
- Site address
- 22 JERICHO ROAD
- City
- BERLIN
- State
- NH
- ZIP
- 03570
- Mailing
- 107 RUE INDUSTRIELLE NADEAU
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 336211
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.133 A01
- Issued
- Nov 6, 2018
- Abate by
- Nov 27, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,772 · Current $1,040 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation Location: Site On or about 7/19/18 Employees pouring corrosive chemicals, such as but not limited to Norox Azox (containing peroxides) from one container to another were not provided adequate eye and face protection as required by the chemical manufacturer.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1040
- — Z (S) $2772
1910.134 C
- Issued
- Nov 6, 2018
- Abate by
- Dec 26, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,217 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c): The employer did not develop and implement a written respiratory protection program with required worksite-specific procedures and elements for required respirator use: Location: Site On or about 7/19/18 Employer does not have a respiratory protection program in place and mandates employees use of respirators.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $2217
1910.134 C01 II
- Issued
- Nov 6, 2018
- Abate by
- Dec 26, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(ii): The written program did not contain provisions for medical evaluations of employees required to use respirators Location: Site On or about 7/19/18 medical evaluations were not provided to employees required to use respirators.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 C01 III
- Issued
- Nov 6, 2018
- Abate by
- Dec 26, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(iii): The written program did not contain fit test procedures for tight-fitting respirators: Location: Site On or about 7/19/18 the Employer did not provide fit testing for employees required to use respirators during spray operations.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 C01 VIII
- Issued
- Nov 6, 2018
- Abate by
- Dec 26, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(viii): The written program did not contain provisions for training of employees in the proper use of respirators, including putting on and removing them, any limitations on their use, and their maintenance: Location: Site On or about 7/19/18 the Employer did not provide training for employees required to use respirators during spray operations.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Nov 6, 2018
- Abate by
- Dec 26, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,772 · Current $1,040 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii) Location: site On or about 7/19/18 The employer did not develop or implement a written hazard communication program when employees were using hazardous chemical to include but not limited to: Chemlease MPP 2180, 3M Hi-Tack Composite Spray Adhesive 71 Green, Acetone, Norox Azox and polyester Resign Solution (H834-WWH-28).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1040
- — Z (S) $2772
More inspections at Deflex Innovations INC.
View Deflex Innovations INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 336211)
More inspections in NH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343319695.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.