OSHA Inspection: JAIME BUCIO

Issued

Nov 23, 2018

Abate by

Mar 15, 2019

Penalty

Initial $2,772 · Current $2,772

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: (Construction Reference: 1926.59)    Jaime Bucio, Sugar Hill, GA - On or about 09/24/2018, employees used hazardous chemical products such as but not limited to Portland Cement and silica dust resulting from cutting concrete stones. A written hazard communication program was not developed, implemented and or maintained as required by the hazard communication standard.

Issued

Nov 23, 2018

Abate by

Mar 15, 2019

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8):   The employer did not maintain in the workplace copies of the required safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical, and did not ensure that they were readily accessible during each work  shift to employees when they were in their work area(s) (Construction Reference: 1926.59)    Jaime Bucio, Sugar Hill, GA - On or about 09/24/2018, employees used hazardous chemical products such as but not limited to Portland Cement and silica dust resulting from cutting concrete stones. Safety data sheets were not maintained and readily accessible, as required by the hazard communication standard.

Issued

Nov 23, 2018

Abate by

Mar 15, 2019

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: (Construction Reference: 1926.59)    Jaime Bucio, Sugar Hill, GA - On or about 09/24/2018, employees used hazardous chemical products such as but not limited to Portland Cement and silica dust resulting from cutting concrete stones. Information and training required by the hazard communication standard was not provided.

Issued

Nov 23, 2018

Abate by

Mar 15, 2019

Penalty

Initial $2,772 · Current $2,772

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.102(a)(2): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used eye protection that provided side protection when there is a hazard from flying objects.    Jaime Bucio, Sugar Hill, GA - On or about 09/24/2018, employees were exposed to eye injuries from flying objects. Employees were not required the use eye of eye protection when:    a. using a 14-inch Heavy Duty Cut-off saw S/N 37033140 to cut concrete stones;   b. using a hammer to cut concrete stones.

Issued

Nov 23, 2018

Abate by

Mar 15, 2019

Penalty

Initial $2,772 · Current $2,772

Hazardous substances 9010

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.1153(c)(1): For each employee engaged in a task identified on Table 1, the employer did not fully and properly implement the engineering controls, work practices, and respiratory protection specified for the task on Table 1, unless the employer assesses and limits the exposure of the employee to respirable crystalline silica in accordance with paragraph (d) of this section.    Jaime Bucio, Sugar Hill, GA - On or about 09/24/2018, employees were exposed to silica dust while using a stationary masonry saw S/N 370331140 for dry cutting concrete stones. The employer did not implement engineering controls (a saw equipped with integrated water delivery system), work practices and respiratory protection as required by the Table I of the standard.

Issued

Nov 23, 2018

Abate by

Mar 15, 2019

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9010

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.1153(d)(2)(i): The employer did not assess the exposure of each employee who was or may reasonably be expected to be exposed to respirable crystalline silica at or above the action level in accordance with either the performance option in paragraph (d)(2)(ii) or the scheduled monitoring option in paragraph (d)(2)(iii) of this section:    Jaime Bucio, Sugar Hill, GA - On or about 09/24/2018, employees were exposed to silica dust while using a stationary masonry saw S/N 370331140 for dry cutting concrete stones. The employer did not assess the exposure of each employee who was or may reasonably be expected to be exposed to respirable crystalline silica to determine if the exposure is at or above the action level of 25 ug/m3.