Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: WHITE BUFFALO HEMP COMPANY

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of WHITE BUFFALO HEMP COMPANY in 1254 SHERMAN DR., LONGMONT, CO 80504 (NAICS 325414). OSHA activity number 343501730.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch White Buffalo Hemp Company — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for White Buffalo Hemp Company is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1254 SHERMAN DR.
City
LONGMONT
State
CO
ZIP
80504
Mailing
1254 SHERMAN DR., LONGMONT, CO 80504
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
325414
Employees
18
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.307 C02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Jan 17, 2019
Abate by
Feb 7, 2019
Penalty
Initial $2,956 · Current $1,900 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.307(c)(2)(i): Equipment, wiring methods, and installations of equipment in hazardous (classified) locations were not intrinsically safe, approved for the hazardous (classified) location, or safe for the hazardous (classified) location:    (a) White Buffalo Hemp Co., 1254 Sherman Dr. Unit 5, Longmont, CO 80501: On or before October 1, 2018,  the employer did not ensure that equipment, wiring methods, and installations of equipment in hazardous (classified) locations were intrinsically safe, approved for the hazardous (classified) location, or safe for the hazardous (classified) location. Employees use ethanol in the marijuana extraction process.  The ethanol is used to soak bags of marijuana in open 55 gallon drums.  The filtrations unit, salad spinner, outlets, and ceiling lights located within the soak  are not approved for a Class I Division 1 location. This condition exposed employees to a flash fire hazard due to the potential for an ignition source in an area flammable vapors are present.    Abatement Note:  Among other methods, appropriate abatement methods include:  (1) Installation of engineering controls, such as chemical fume hoods, which exhausts flammable or combustible vapors from the room.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1900
  • — Z (S) $2956

1910.134 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Jan 17, 2019
Abate by
Feb 7, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1):  A written respiratory protection program with worksite specific procedures, as specified in subparagraphs (c)(1)(i) through (ix) of this section, was not established and implemented where respirator(s) were required by the employer:  (a) White Buffalo Hemp Co., 1254 Sherman Dr. Unit 5, Longmont, CO 80501: On or before October 1, 2018, the employer did not ensure that a written respiratory protection program was established and implemented in the workplace when the employer required the use of respirators during painting operations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 D01 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Jan 17, 2019
Abate by
Feb 7, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminant's chemical state and physical form:  (a) White Buffalo Hemp Co., 1254 Sherman Dr. Unit 5, Longmont, CO 80501: On or before October 1, 2018, the employer did not assess employees exposure to the air contaminants associated with extraction operations performed by employees.  This condition exposed employees to respiratory hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Jan 17, 2019
Abate by
Feb 7, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:   (a) White Buffalo Hemp Co., 1254 Sherman Dr. Unit 5, Longmont, CO 80501: On or before October 1, 2018,  the employer did not ensure that all employees who were required to wear a tight-fitting respirators while conducting extraction operations were medically evaluated prior to use of the respirator.     Note:  The employer may discontinue an employee's medical evaluations when the employee is no longer required to use a respirator.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 F01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Jan 17, 2019
Abate by
Feb 7, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):    (a) White Buffalo Hemp Co., 1254 Sherman Dr. Unit 5, Longmont, CO 80501: On or before October 1, 2018,  the employer did not ensure that all employees who were required to wear a tight-fitting respirators while conducting extraction operations were given a fit test prior to use of the respirator.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Jan 17, 2019
Abate by
Feb 7, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  (a) White Buffalo Hemp Co., 1254 Sherman Dr. Unit 5, Longmont, CO 80501: On or before October 1, 2018, the employer did not have a written Hazard Communication Program in place that reflected the changes to the standard that occurred in 2012, and became enforceable in 2015. The written program did not have updated section for Safety Data Sheets (SDS), or labeling requirements including pictograms, hazard statements, and signal words. This condition exposes employees to hazards associated with the use of ethanol.  Abatement Note:  Abatement certification is required for this item (see enclosed "Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet").
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 H01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Jan 17, 2019
Abate by
Feb 7, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:   (a) White Buffalo Hemp Co., 1254 Sherman Dr. Unit 5, Longmont, CO 80501: On or before October 1, 2018, the employer did not have a written Hazard Communication Program in place that reflected the changes to the standard that occurred in 2012, and became enforceable in 2015. The written program did not have updated section for Safety Data Sheets (SDS), or labeling requirements including pictograms, hazard statements, and signal words. Since the program was missing elements the employer could not adequately train employees on those elements. This condition exposes employees to hazards associated with the use of ethanol.  Abatement Note:  Abatement certification is required for this item (see enclosed "Certification of Corrective Action Worksheet").
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View White Buffalo Hemp Company's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343501730.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.