COLORADO SPRINGS, CO —
OSHA Inspection: WHITE BUFFALO HEMP COMPANY
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of WHITE BUFFALO HEMP COMPANY in 3820 HANCOCK EXPRESSWAY SUITE A, COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80911 (NAICS 325412). OSHA activity number 344072863.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- WHITE BUFFALO HEMP COMPANY
- Site address
- 3820 HANCOCK EXPRESSWAY SUITE A
- City
- COLORADO SPRINGS
- State
- CO
- ZIP
- 80911
- Mailing
- 3820 HANCOCK EXPRESSWAY SUITE A, COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80911
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 325412
- Employees
- 13
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
12 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.106 D04 I
- Issued
- Jul 5, 2019
- Abate by
- Jul 31, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $3,789 · Current $1,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.106(d)(4)(i): Inside storage rooms were not constructed to meet the required fire-resistive rating for their use: (a) On or about May 24, 2019, employees were exposed to fire and explosion hazards created by the employer storing ethanol in 55 gallon drums, inside an office space room that was not designed for such use.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1500
- — Z (S) $3789
1910.106 D04 IV
- Issued
- Jul 5, 2019
- Abate by
- Jul 31, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.106(d)(4)(iv): Inside storage room was not provided with either a gravity or a mechanical exhaust ventilation system; and/or ventilation system was not designed to provide for a complete change of air within the room at least six times per hour; and/or mechanical exhaust system was not controlled by a switch located outside of the door; and/or the ventilating equipment and lighting fixtures were not operated by the same switch; and/or a pilot light was not installed adjacent to the switch with Category 1 or 2 flammable liquids, or Category 3 flammable liquids with a flashpoint below 100 degrees F (37.8 degrees C), were being dispensed within the room; and/or gravity ventilation was provided, without the fresh air intake, as well as the exhaust outlet from the room, being on the exterior of the building in which the room is located as required: (a) On or about May 24, 2019, employees were exposed to fire and explosion hazards created by the employer storing ethanol in 55 gallon drums, inside an office space room without an adequate ventilation system.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.106 H07 I A
- Issued
- Jul 5, 2019
- Abate by
- Jul 31, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $3,789 · Current $1,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.106(h)(7)(i)(a): Precautions were not taken to prevent the ignition of flammable vapors. Sources of ignition include but are not limited to open flames; lightning; smoking; cutting and welding; hot surfaces; frictional heat; static, electrical, and mechanical sparks; spontaneous ignition, including heat-producing chemical reactions; and radiant heat: (a) On or about May 24, 2019, employees were exposed to flash fire hazards created by transferring ethanol from 275 gallon plastic totes to 55 gallon plastic drums without grounding and bonding to control static electricity discharge.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1500
- — Z (S) $3789
1910.132 D01
- Issued
- Jul 5, 2019
- Abate by
- Jul 31, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $4,546 · Current $1,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards were present, or were likely to be present, which necessitated the use of personal protective equipment: a) On or about May 24, 2019, the employer did not assess the workplace to determine if employees would be required to utilize personal protective equipment, included but not limited to flame resistant clothing, in the process of extracting Cannabidiol (CBD) with ethanol and other work activities.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1500
- — Z (S) $4546
1910.1200 H03 I
- Issued
- Jul 5, 2019
- Abate by
- Jul 31, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $2,273 · Current $800 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(i): The employee training did not include the methods and observations used to detect the presence or release of a hazardous chemical in the work area: (a) On or about May 24, 2019, the employer did not ensure employee training covered the methods and observations to detect the presence or release of hazardous chemicals, including but not limited to ethanol.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $800
- — Z (S) $2273
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Jul 5, 2019
- Abate by
- Jul 31, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $5,001 · Current $3,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program with worksite specific procedures, as specified in subparagraphs (c)(1)(i) through (ix) of this section, was not established and implemented where respirator(s) were required by the employer: (a) On or about May 24, 2019, the employer did not ensure that a written respiratory protection program was established and implemented in the workplace when the employer required the use of respirators during Cannabidiol (CBD) extraction operations. White Buffalo Hemp Company was previously cited for a violation of this Occupational Safety and Health standard or its equivalent standard which was contained in OSHA Inspection Number 1350173, Citation Number 2, Item Number 1a, and was affirmed as a final order on January 28, 2019, with respect to a workplace located at 1254 Sherman Dr. Unit 5, Longmont, CO 80501.
Recent events (2)
- — I (R) $3000
- — Z (R) $5001
1910.134 D01 III
- Issued
- Jul 5, 2019
- Abate by
- Jul 31, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminant's chemical state and physical form: (a) On or about May 24, 2019, the employer did not assess employees exposure to the air contaminants associated with Cannabidiol (CBD) extraction operations performed by employees. This condition exposed employees to respiratory hazards. White Buffalo Hemp Company was previously cited for a violation of this Occupational Safety and Health standard or its equivalent standard which was contained in OSHA Inspection Number 1350173, Citation Number 2, Item Number 1b, and was affirmed as a final order on January 28, 2019, with respect to a workplace located at 1254 Sherman Dr. Unit 5, Longmont, CO 80501.
Recent events (2)
- — I (R) $0
- — Z (R) $0
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Jul 5, 2019
- Abate by
- Jul 31, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: (a) On or about May 24, 2019, the employer did not ensure that all employees who were required to wear a tight-fitting respirators while conducting Cannabidiol (CBD) extraction operations were medically evaluated prior to use of the respirator. White Buffalo Hemp Company was previously cited for a violation of this Occupational Safety and Health standard or its equivalent standard which was contained in OSHA Inspection Number 1350173, Citation Number 2, Item Number 1c, and was affirmed as a final order on January 28, 2019, with respect to a workplace located at 1254 Sherman Dr. Unit 5, Longmont, CO 80501.
Recent events (2)
- — I (R) $0
- — Z (R) $0
1910.134 F01
- Issued
- Jul 5, 2019
- Abate by
- Jul 31, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT): (a) On or about May 24, 2019, the employer did not ensure that all employees who were required to wear a tight-fitting respirators while conducting Cannabidiol (CBD) extraction operations were given a fit test prior to use of the respirator. White Buffalo Hemp Company was previously cited for a violation of this Occupational Safety and Health standard or its equivalent standard which was contained in OSHA Inspection Number 1350173, Citation Number 2, Item Number 1d, and was affirmed as a final order on January 28, 2019, with respect to a workplace located at 1254 Sherman Dr. Unit 5, Longmont, CO 80501.
Recent events (2)
- — I (R) $0
- — Z (R) $0
1910.307 C02 I
- Issued
- Jul 5, 2019
- Abate by
- Jul 31, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $8,335 · Current $6,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.307(c)(2)(i): Equipment, wiring methods, and installations of equipment in hazardous (classified) locations were not intrinsically safe, approved for the hazardous (classified) location, or safe for the hazardous (classified) location: (a) On or about May 24, 2019, the employer did not ensure that equipment, wiring methods, and installations of equipment in hazardous (classified) locations were intrinsically safe, approved for the hazardous (classified) location, or safe for the hazardous (classified) location. Employees use ethanol in the Cannabidiol (CBD) extraction process. The ethanol is used to soak bags of hemp in open 55 gallon drums. The filtrations unit, air compressor, outlets, and ceiling lights located within the extraction and soak areas were not approved for a Class I Division 1 location. This condition exposed employees to a flash fire hazard due to the potential for an ignition source in an area flammable vapors are present. White Buffalo Hemp Company was previously cited for a violation of this Occupational Safety and Health standard or its equivalent standard which was contained in OSHA Inspection Number 1350173, Citation Number 1, Item Number 1, and was affirmed as a final order on January 28, 2019, with respect to a workplace located at 1254 Sherman Dr. Unit 5, Longmont, CO 80501.
Recent events (2)
- — I (R) $6000
- — Z (R) $8335
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Jul 5, 2019
- Abate by
- Jul 31, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $333 · Current $200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: (a) On or bout May 24, 2019, the employer did not have a written Hazard Communication Program in place that included a section for Safety Data Sheets (SDS), or labeling requirements including pictograms, hazard statements, and signal words. This condition exposed employees to hazards associated with the use of ethanol. White Buffalo Hemp Company was previously cited for a violation of this Occupational Safety and Health standard or its equivalent standard which was contained in OSHA Inspection Number 1350173, Citation Number 2, Item Number 2a, and was affirmed as a final order on January 28, 2019, with respect to a workplace located at 1254 Sherman Dr. Unit 5, Longmont, CO 80501.
Recent events (2)
- — I (R) $200
- — Z (R) $333
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Jul 5, 2019
- Abate by
- Jul 31, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: (a) On or about May 24, 2019, the employer did not have a written Hazard Communication Program in place that included a sections on Safety Data Sheets (SDS), labeling requirements including pictograms, hazard statements, and signal words. Since the program was missing elements the employer could not adequately train employees on those elements. This condition exposed employees to hazards associated with the use of ethanol. White Buffalo Hemp Company was previously cited for a violation of this Occupational Safety and Health standard or its equivalent standard which was contained in OSHA Inspection Number 1350173, Citation Number 2, Item Number 2b, and was affirmed as a final order on January 28, 2019, with respect to a workplace located at 1254 Sherman Dr. Unit 5, Longmont, CO 80501.
Recent events (2)
- — I (R) $0
- — Z (R) $0
More inspections at White Buffalo Hemp Company
View White Buffalo Hemp Company's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 325412)
More inspections in CO
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 344072863.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.