Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: TEXAS STEEL CONVERSION

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of TEXAS STEEL CONVERSION in 3101 HOLMES RD, HOUSTON, TX 77051 (NAICS 332996). OSHA activity number 343507679.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Texas Steel Conversion — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Texas Steel Conversion is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
3101 HOLMES RD
City
HOUSTON
State
TX
ZIP
77051
Mailing
3101 HOLMES RD, HOUSTON, TX 77051
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332996
Employees
199
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C07 I A

Other-than-serious 3 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 25, 2019
Abate by
Feb 13, 2019
Penalty
Initial $13,260 · Current $10,608 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i)(A): Authorized employee(s) did not receive training in the recognition of applicable hazardous energy sources, the type and magnitude of the energy available in the workplace, and the methods and means necessary for energy isolate:    a)  Located at the thread line, the authorized employees were exposed to caught in hazards when performing service and maintenance on the Okuma LU45II lathe (SN: 177784) without training on applicable energy sources, type and magnitude of energy and methods to isolate.      b)  Located at the thread line, the authorized employees were exposed to caught in hazards when performing service and maintenance on the Mori Seiki SL-65 (SN: 1212) without training on applicable energy sources, type and magnitude of energy and methods to isolate.      c)  Located at the high speed thread line, the authorized employees were exposed to caught in hazards when performing service and maintenance on the Okuma LU35 (SN: 166197) without training on applicable energy sources, type and magnitude of energy and methods to isolate.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $10608
  • — Z (S) $13260

1910.147 C07 I B

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Jan 25, 2019
Abate by
Feb 13, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i)(B): Affected employees were not instructed in the purpose and use of the energy control procedure:   a)  Located at the thread line, the authorized employees were exposed to caught in hazards when performing service and maintenance on the Okuma LU45II lathe (SN: 177784) without training on the purpose and use of energy control procedures.    b)  Located at the thread line, the authorized employees were exposed to caught in hazards when performing service and maintenance on the Mori Seiki SL-65 (SN: 1212) without training on the purpose and use of energy control procedures.    c)  Located at the high speed thread line, the authorized employees were exposed to caught in hazards when performing service and maintenance on the Okuma LU35 (SN: 166197) without training on the purpose and use of energy control procedures.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 D06

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 25, 2019
Abate by
Apr 22, 2019
Penalty
Initial $13,260 · Current $13,260
29 CFR 1910.147(d)(6): Prior to starting work on machines or equipment that had been locked out or tagged out, the authorized employee did not verify that isolation and deenergization of the machine or equipment had been accomplished:    a)  Located in the threading line department, where employees were exposed to struck-by hazards when performing service and maintenance tasks on equipment such as Mori Seiki, model SL-65 (SN: 1212) without verifying isolation of the machine prior to work.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $13260
  • — Z (S) $13260

1910.147 F03 II D

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 25, 2019
Abate by
Apr 22, 2019
Penalty
Initial $10,419 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(f)(3)(ii)(D): Each authorized employee did not affix a personal lockout or tagout device to the group lockout device before working on the machine or equipment:      a) Located in the thread line department, where CNC operators were exposed to struck by hazards when performing service and maintenance tasks on equipment such as an Okuma LU45 lathe (SN: 177784) without applying a lock to the group lockout device.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $10419

1910.178 L01 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jan 25, 2019
Abate by
Feb 13, 2019
Penalty
Initial $6,251 · Current $5,001 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l):    a)  Located in the threading department, were employees were exposed to struck-by hazards when operating forklifts without ensuring employees completed forklift training.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $5000.8
  • — Z (S) $6251

1910.212 A01

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jan 25, 2019
Abate by
Feb 13, 2019
Penalty
Initial $13,260 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:  a)  On or about September 19, 2018, located in the treading line department, where an employee was exposed to amputation hazards when operating an Okuma Lathe LU45II (SN: 177784) without closing the door.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $13260

1910.212 A03 III

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jan 25, 2019
Abate by
Apr 22, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $10,608
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(iii): Special hand tools for placing and removing material(s) was not provided to permit easy handling of material without the operator placing a hand in the danger zone:      a)  On or about September 19, 2018, located in the treading line department, where an employee was exposed to amputation hazards when operating an Okuma Lathe LU45II (SN: 177784) without a specialized hand tool.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $10608
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 C06 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jan 25, 2019
Abate by
Feb 13, 2019
Penalty
Initial $1,169 · Current $1,169
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i): The employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirement of this standard were being followed:   a) At the jobsite, periodic inspections of energy control procedures were not conducted annually when employees perform service and maintenance tasks on equipment such as, but not limited to, Okuma LU45II (SN:177784) lathes.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $1169
  • — Z (O) $1169

View Texas Steel Conversion's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343507679.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.