Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MARS WRIGLEY CONFECTIONERY US, LLC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of MARS WRIGLEY CONFECTIONERY US, LLC in 100 MARS BLVD, TOPEKA, KS 66619 (NAICS 311351). OSHA activity number 343511549.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Mars Wrigley Confectionery US, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Mars Wrigley Confectionery US, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
100 MARS BLVD
City
TOPEKA
State
KS
ZIP
66619
Mailing
100 MARS BLVD, TOPEKA, KS 66619
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
311351
Employees
340
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.119 H02 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 29, 2019
Abate by
Apr 24, 2019
Penalty
Initial $13,260 · Current $7,293 Reduced

Hazardous substances 0170

29 CFR 1910.119(h)(2)(i): The employer, when selecting a contractor, did not obtain and evaluate information regarding the contract employer's safety performance and program:    Employees engaged in operating, inspecting, testing, and maintaining (preventive maintenance, service, repair) activities at the Central Utility Building (CUB) and in the Ammonia Engine Room were exposed to catastrophic release of ammonia which results in asphyxiation, explosion and flash fire leading to death and injury to persons in and near the facility.  The employer did not obtain and evaluate the safety and health performance and written programs of the contractor (Airgas) that delivers or unloads ammonia from a tank truck to the ammonia refrigeration system. The driver of Airgas contractor and P1 Group Technician participated in the unloading of ammonia into process tanks while the host employees observed from the CUB office.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $7293
  • — Z (S) $13260

1910.119 J04 I

Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 29, 2019
Abate by
Apr 24, 2019
Penalty
Initial $13,260 · Current $13,260

Hazardous substances 0170

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(4)(i): Inspections and tests were not performed on process equipment:  Employees engaged in operating, inspecting, testing, and maintaining (preventive maintenance, service, repair) activities at the Central Utility Building (CUB) and in the Ammonia Engine Room were exposed fire, explosion, and/or inhalation hazards from ammonia vapors.  The employer failed to ensure inspection and tests were performed on safety systems for process equipment to maintain its mechanical integrity as follows:   a) Engine Room Emergency Shutdown (E-Stops). b) Engine Room Emergency Ventilation Systems used for safety purposes to assure it performs at a rate specified in the design. c) Ammonia System Shut Off /King Valves.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $13260
  • — Z (S) $13260

1910.119 J05

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 29, 2019
Abate by
Apr 24, 2019
Penalty
Initial $13,260 · Current $13,260

Hazardous substances 0170

29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5): The employer did not correct deficiencies in equipment that were outside acceptable limits (defined by the process safety information in paragraph (d) of this section) before further use or in a safe and timely manner when necessary means were taken to assure safe operation:  Employees engaged in operating, inspecting, testing, and maintaining (preventive maintenance, service, repair) activities at the Central Utility Building (CUB) and in the Ammonia Engine Room were exposed to the hazards of being struck-by over-pressured equipment and toxic ammonia inhalation and burns.  The employer fails to fully implement its mechanical integrity procedure, when it did not replace safety relief valves every 5 years or sooner if necessary. The employer did not ensure that the safety pressure relief valves were removed and replaced within 5 years, or develop an alternative replacement interval based on documented in-service relief valve life, or follow the manufacturer's replacement frequency recommendation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $13260
  • — Z (S) $13260

1910.119 O01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 29, 2019
Abate by
Apr 24, 2019
Penalty
Initial $13,260 · Current $7,293 Reduced

Hazardous substances 0170

29 CFR 1910.119(o)(1): The employer did not certify that they had evaluated compliance with provisions of 29 CFR 1910.119 at least every three years to verify that the procedures and practices developed under this standard were adequate and are being followed:     Employees engaged in operating, inspecting, testing, and maintaining (preventive maintenance, service, repair) activities at the Central Utility Building (CUB) and in the Ammonia Engine Room were exposed to catastrophic release of ammonia which results in asphyxiation, explosion and flash fire leading to death and injury to persons in and near the facility.  The employer did not certify or evaluate compliance with the provisions of this section that the procedures and practices are adequate and being followed. The employer provided no certifications that it had performed compliance evaluations to verify that its procedures and practices developed under the standard are adequate and being followed for the 2016 PSM Compliance Audit
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $7293
  • — Z (S) $13260

1910.219 C02 I

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 29, 2019
Penalty
Initial $9,472 · Current $9,472
29 CFR 1910.219(c)(2)(i): All exposed part(s) of horizontal shafting seven (7) feet or less from floor or working platform were not protected by stationary casing(s) enclosing shafting completely or by trough(s) enclosing sides and top or sides and bottom of shafting:  Employees engaged in operating, inspecting, testing, and maintaining equipment at the Central Utility Building (CUB) and in the Ammonia Engine Room were exposed to entanglement hazards.  The following drive shafts on motors were not guarded:           (a) Basin Cleaner #1 UTL-NH3-EVC-SEP01         (b) Basin Cleaner #2 UTL-NH3-EVC-SEP02         (c) Basin Cleaner #3 UTL-NH3-EVC-SEP03
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $9472
  • — Z (S) $9472

View Mars Wrigley Confectionery US, LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343511549.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.