BURLINGTON, WI —
OSHA Inspection: MARCOS HERNANDEZ MARTINEZ
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of MARCOS HERNANDEZ MARTINEZ in 1500 SERENA LANE, BURLINGTON, WI 53105 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 343525622.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MARCOS HERNANDEZ MARTINEZ
- Site address
- 1500 SERENA LANE
- City
- BURLINGTON
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 53105
- Mailing
- 1510 68TH ST., KENOSHA, WI 53143
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 1
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 D01
- Issued
- Jan 4, 2019
- Abate by
- Jan 18, 2019
- Penalty
- Initial $311 · Current $311
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required. (a) The employer failed to provide documentation to the Agency demonstrating that abatement is completed for the serious violations that were issued by the Agency.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $311
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Nov 16, 2018
- Abate by
- Nov 23, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $2,217 · Current $2,217
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Employees were not provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents: (a) The employer did not ensure that employees were using eye protection when using pneumatic nail guns for the application of roofing shingles.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2217
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Nov 16, 2018
- Abate by
- Nov 23, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $3,326 · Current $3,326
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): (a) The employer did not ensure that employees were using fall protection when conducting roofing work on a residential building.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3326
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Nov 16, 2018
- Abate by
- Dec 13, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $3,326 · Current $3,326
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: (a) The employer did not ensure that employees received training in recognizing fall hazards and implementing the use fall protection.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3326
More inspections at Marcos Hernandez Martinez
View Marcos Hernandez Martinez's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343525622.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.