Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ABOVE BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION, INC.

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of ABOVE BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION, INC. in 4 SHELTER LANE, CUMBERLAND, RI 02864 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 343581724.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Above Brothers Construction, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Above Brothers Construction, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
4 SHELTER LANE
City
CUMBERLAND
State
RI
ZIP
02864
Mailing
42 PROSPECT STREET, MILFORD, MA 01757
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
4
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 3 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Jan 23, 2019
Abate by
Feb 25, 2019
Penalty
Initial $319 · Current $319
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated:  (a) Establishment:  As of January 23, 2019, the employer had not certified to OSHA that the abatement had been completed for Citation 1, Items 4a, 4b, and 4c from Inspection number 1358172, issued on 12/03/2018, with a final order date of 12/31/2018.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $319

1903.19 D01

Other-than-serious 3 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Jan 23, 2019
Abate by
Feb 25, 2019
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required:  (a) Establishment:  As of January 23, 2019, the employer had not provided the required abatement documentation to OSHA for Citation 1, Items 4a, 4b, and 4c from Inspection number 1358172, issued on 12/03/2018, with a final order date of 12/31/2018.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 3, 2018
Penalty
Initial $3,049 · Current $3,049
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:   (a) Worksite:  On or about 11/5/2018, employees were not protected from overhead hazards by protective helmets while working below roofers.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3049

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Dec 3, 2018
Penalty
Initial $4,268 · Current $4,268
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used:  (a) Worksite:  On or about 11/5/2018, the employer did not provide proper access to Ladder-Jack scaffolds.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4268

1926.502 D15

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 3, 2018
Penalty
Initial $4,268 · Current $4,268
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(15): Anchorage points used for attachment of personal fall arrest equipment were not  independent of any anchorage point being used to support or suspend platforms and capable of supporting at least 5,000 pounds (22.2 kN) per employee:  (a) Worksite:  On or about 11/5/2018, the employer did not ensure that hinged roof anchors, that employees used as part of their fall arrest system, were fully secured to the roof surface.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4268

1926.1053 B04

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 3, 2018
Abate by
Dec 6, 2018
Penalty
Initial $4,268 · Current $4,268
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4): Ladder(s) were used for purposes other than the purpose for which they were designed:   (a) Worksite:  On or about 11/5/2018, an extension ladder was separated into two sections, where one was used to gain access to the roof's surface and the other was used to support a Ladder-Jack Scaffold System.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4268

1926.1053 B05 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Dec 3, 2018
Abate by
Dec 6, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(5)(i): Non-self-supporting ladders were not used at an angle such that the horizontal distance from the top support to the foot of the ladder was approximately one-quarter of the working length of the ladder:  (a) Worksite:  On or about 11/5/2018, the employer did not ensure that the ladders supporting a Ladder-Jack Scaffold System were set up at an appropriate angle (an approximate 4-1 ratio, in height to distance from structure wall) to maintain the working capacity of the ladders being used.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B16

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 3, 2018
Abate by
Dec 12, 2018
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(16): Portable ladders with structural defects, such as, but not limited to, broken or missing rungs, cleats, or steps, broken or split rails, corroded components, or other faulty or defective components, were not either immediately marked in a manner that readily identifies them as defective, or tagged with "Do Not Use" or similar language, and were not withdrawn from service until repaired:  (a) Worksite:  On or about 11/5/2018, the employer did not ensure that damaged portable ladders were withdrawn from service.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 G01

Repeat Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 3, 2018
Penalty
Initial $8,536 · Current $8,536
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Employees on scaffolds more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level by fall protection established in paragraphs (g)(1)(i)-(vii) of this section:   (a) Worksite:  On or about 11/5/2018, the employer did not ensure that fall protection was used while working from a Ladder-Jack Scaffold System approximately twelve feet above the lower level.  Above Brothers Construction, Inc. was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard, 29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 996612, citation number 001, item number 01 and was affirmed as a final order on 11/17/2014, with respect to a workplace located at Bellevue Avenue, Lynn MA.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (R) $8536

View Above Brothers Construction, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 343581724.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.